From The National Institute of Standards and Technology: “From GPS to Laser Pointers Quantum Science Is All Around Us”
From The National Institute of Standards and Technology
4.12.23
Andrew Wilson
NIST researcher Andrew Wilson holds a surface-electrode ion trap used for quantum information processing. The computer screen behind Wilson shows three white dots, a live microscope image of three single atoms. They are held in a triangle pattern by an ion trap like the one Wilson is holding. Credit: R. Jacobson/NIST.
If you’ve gotten around with GPS, had an MRI, or tormented your cat with a laser pointer, quantum science is a part of your life.
Ahead of “World Quantum Day” this week, we asked Andrew Wilson, who leads NIST’s Quantum Physics Division, to explain just what exactly quantum science is and why it matters.
We’re celebrating World Quantum Day. Let’s start simply. When we say “quantum,” what do we mean by that?
Well, it means different things to different people. But it essentially comes down to using fundamental quantum properties to do great things. When people talk about using quantum, it generally comes down to two things:
Quantum superposition is something that has two possible forms being in both of those forms to some extent at the same time.
Entanglement means you’ve got at least two things that are always connected together; they have no independent existence anymore. Something that happens to one always affects the other. It’s kind of romantic!
Entanglement and superposition are resources for quantum computing. These are what make quantum computing powerful.
Why are scientists so interested in all things quantum?
I think in the early days of quantum physics, there were ideas like the laser. Quantum physics underpins the laser, and the laser turns out to be rather important. It supports the internet. Quantum also comes into things like MRI imaging and semiconductor chips. So, we rely on quantum behavior to understand how these things work. That’s quantum physics. This early version of quantum physics is called semiclassical physics. And a lot of technology based on this uses superposition. Today, this is widely referred to as Quantum 1.0.
But as we physicists kept working on quantum systems, and getting better at making and controlling these, we started thinking, OK, maybe we can do useful things with entanglement. So, we added entanglement to the toolbox. That’s Quantum 2.0. Quantum 2.0 is about trying to capture the advantages and the practical applications of both superposition and entanglement. We’re really trying to see how we can make entanglement practical. There will have to be many scientific breakthroughs, including fundamental science, for this kind of technology to be ubiquitous in our economy and society.
At the same time that progress was being made in labs, some clever people realized that this toolbox could be used for information processing. Quantum computing emerged from the “coming together” of clever ideas and advancements in labs, a mix of quantum physics and information science.
We can develop quantum computers, but what else can we do?
We can also use superposition and entanglement for improved sensors and communications. We can make quantum sensors that measure things more precisely than classical physics allows. We can communicate information in quantum form that is resistant to eavesdropping. The challenge with these Quantum 2.0 things is making them practical. There is much work to do, and it’s very exciting to see the progress being made.
Another thing that makes quantum interesting is that there are potential applications in many areas, far beyond physics. There are applications being pursued in chemistry, biology, health care, finance, transport, manufacturing and so forth. It can be a very interdisciplinary field. That makes it hard because each one of us only has a certain amount of expertise. On the other hand, the cool part is you get to collaborate with people who are experts in other things and learn from them.
When you hear the word “quantum,” it sounds so abstract. Where does it show up in our everyday lives?
People do tend to think of quantum as sort of a weird and abstract thing. Because most of the stuff we deal with in the real world — pens, cars, coffee cups, etc. — those things don’t behave quantum mechanically in our everyday experience. Because quantum mechanics is not an everyday experience for most people, it can seem very strange.
But quantum is not just a theory, it’s just the way nature is. For those of us who work with this every day, it’s not mysterious or abstract. It’s as practical as anything else that we deal with during the day, including pens and coffee.
As I said, there are lots of practical applications of quantum. There are parts of electronics that rely heavily on quantum mechanics. Health care, communication, lots of technology relies on it.
One of the most common practical applications is timekeeping. The only reason you’re able to have a GPS on your phone or in your car is that you’ve got some atomic clocks in satellites. You may not know it, but you’re using quantum superposition in those clocks, making sure you can figure out where you’re going. So if I’m supposed to be meeting my wife at a restaurant, and I don’t know where it is, I’m relying on quantum mechanics to get me there, to achieve that goal. This is an everyday use of quantum mechanics, looking at our phones and figuring out where we’re going.
Why is it important to continue to research quantum science?
Studying quantum may lead us to the next big thing, or a bunch of things, whatever the next laser or GPS may be. There are a lot of ideas out there for how we can use quantum, and people are frantically trying to figure out:
What can quantum technology be used for?
How can we advance quantum technology so that it can be used for practical problems?
Economies are affected by Quantum 1.0, and there’s a high probability that Quantum 2.0 will have another transformational impact. There are so many ideas floating around that people are excited about; that’s why we’re doing this.
NIST specifically is doing this because we do measurement science to help spur innovation and competitiveness. People come to NIST with measurement problems, and often, we can overcome classical barriers to this measurement problem using quantum mechanics. That’s why NIST has been a leader in quantum mechanics since its earliest day because of the precision measurement involved.
The more you can measure something very precisely, the more you can make improvements to that technology. So there’s a lovely cycle of measuring more precisely, improving the technology, and measuring more. But at some point, we hit the limit of the measurement scheme we’re using, and we have to develop a new approach. Measurement science is key to advancing technology. That’s how I think about it.
Where did your fascination with this area of research come from?
When I was a kid, I liked building and fixing things. My bike would break, and it was the way I got around, so I was highly motivated to figure out how to fix it. So, I pulled things apart and put them back together again. I tinkered with things. I had some people around me who had knowledge of electronics, and I started building little simple circuits or simple gadgets with little motors or lights.
I wanted to understand how things work. Why is it doing this thing? And I was curious and got drawn into things. It helps to have a high tolerance for being confused. I want to say that physicists are perpetually confused about the latest thing they’re thinking about, and that is the way we learn, right? You’re confused today. You figure something out, and you’re very happy about this, but you’ll be confused by something new tomorrow!
When I got into the lab, I found I was pretty good at fixing things, making things work, and understanding why things don’t work and fixing those things. So, when you have that kind of inclination, you wind up as an experimentalist.
NIST researcher Andrew Wilson points to an ion trap inside a glass vacuum envelope. This trap is used for quantum computing. It can confine more than one atomic element (beryllium and magnesium) at the same time. NIST pioneered this capability, and it’s now being used by companies working on quantum computing. Credit: R. Jacobson/NIST.
And as for quantum, it’s just cool, right? For example, I do a lot of work with lasers. There’s almost nothing cooler than lasers. If you’ve only seen the little red dots of a laser pointer, come into some of these labs, and you’ll see the most incredible colors in nature. It’s basically a rainbow on steroids. They’re so beautiful and just wonderful to be around. There’s also a profound sense of joy from seeing something that no one has ever seen before, sometimes a discovery that scientists have been seeking for decades.
The lab feels like a playground to me, albeit with a challenging scientific mission, hard work, long hours, occasional setbacks, and serious safety requirements that require careful following of protocols.
A lab is like Disneyland to an experimental physicist like me. When you’re in the lab and you see on your screen a signal, an image, a trace of something, after all that hard work, it’s just a reminder of how incredible nature really is. It’s better than any fiction book that’s ever been written in my humble opinion. This work just draws you in.
And of course, we’re not just tinkering around here, we’re mission-driven. We push very hard; it’s also a very competitive field. Many of us like to compete.
What is on the horizon for quantum science? What excites you about the future?
There’s a ton of really great science being done and quantum technologies being developed. We now do things in the lab routinely that even just a few years ago we only dreamed about being able to do and didn’t know how. We can implement important algorithms for quantum computing. We can build sensing-type devices with quantum performance far beyond what anyone has had before. We can communicate quantum information over greater distances and with better fidelity than ever before.
There are different sorts of quantum computers that many companies are now building. NIST is developing ideas and technologies that these companies will need in the future as they try to extend the capabilities of their machines.
Many things about how quantum technologies might evolve remain unclear, but we as scientists are just very patient, slowly chipping away at problems. When you’re chasing after something really important, that can be massively transformative, you have to have a lot of resilience and grit.
Scientists hammer things out — improve things by factors of two — year after year. It’s like a running a marathon. We have our 100-meter races, too, but quantum is really a sustained effort. NIST has had a sustained quantum effort for decades now.
As we begin to work on potential applications of quantum, we’re learning so much about things beyond quantum physics. It’s exciting to support companies that are part of the emerging quantum industry and to see the creative ways they are advancing technologies. Perhaps we will be able to look back at this moment in time as when quantum revolutionized technology, in the same way that silicon chips and integrated circuits did in the 1960s and ’70s. I hope so. We shall see.
See the full article here.
Comments are invited and will be appreciated, especially if the reader finds any errors which I can correct. Use “Reply”.
five-ways-keep-your-child-safe-school-shootings
Please help promote STEM in your local schools.
NIST Campus, Gaitherberg, MD.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology‘s Mission, Vision, Core Competencies, and Core Values
Mission
To promote U.S. innovation and industrial competitiveness by advancing measurement science, standards, and technology in ways that enhance economic security and improve our quality of life.
NIST’s vision
NIST will be the world’s leader in creating critical measurement solutions and promoting equitable standards. Our efforts stimulate innovation, foster industrial competitiveness, and improve the quality of life.
NIST’s core competencies
Measurement science
Rigorous traceability
Development and use of standards
NIST’s core values
NIST is an organization with strong values, reflected both in our history and our current work. NIST leadership and staff will uphold these values to ensure a high performing environment that is safe and respectful of all.
Perseverance: We take the long view, planning the future with scientific knowledge and imagination to ensure continued impact and relevance for our stakeholders.
Integrity: We are ethical, honest, independent, and provide an objective perspective.
Inclusivity: We work collaboratively to harness the diversity of people and ideas, both inside and outside of NIST, to attain the best solutions to multidisciplinary challenges.
Excellence: We apply rigor and critical thinking to achieve world-class results and continuous improvement in everything we do.
Background
The Articles of Confederation, ratified by the colonies in 1781, contained the clause, “The United States in Congress assembled shall also have the sole and exclusive right and power of regulating the alloy and value of coin struck by their own authority, or by that of the respective states—fixing the standards of weights and measures throughout the United States”. Article 1, section 8, of the Constitution of the United States (1789), transferred this power to Congress; “The Congress shall have power…To coin money, regulate the value thereof, and of foreign coin, and fix the standard of weights and measures”.
In January 1790, President George Washington, in his first annual message to Congress stated that, “Uniformity in the currency, weights, and measures of the United States is an object of great importance, and will, I am persuaded, be duly attended to”, and ordered Secretary of State Thomas Jefferson to prepare a plan for Establishing Uniformity in the Coinage, Weights, and Measures of the United States, afterwards referred to as the Jefferson report. On October 25, 1791, Washington appealed a third time to Congress, “A uniformity of the weights and measures of the country is among the important objects submitted to you by the Constitution and if it can be derived from a standard at once invariable and universal, must be no less honorable to the public council than conducive to the public convenience”, but it was not until 1838, that a uniform set of standards was worked out. In 1821, John Quincy Adams had declared “Weights and measures may be ranked among the necessities of life to every individual of human society”.
From 1830 until 1901, the role of overseeing weights and measures was carried out by the Office of Standard Weights and Measures, which was part of the U.S. Coast and Geodetic Survey in the Department of the Treasury.
Bureau of Standards
In 1901 in response to a bill proposed by Congressman James H. Southard (R- Ohio) the National Bureau of Standards was founded with the mandate to provide standard weights and measures and to serve as the national physical laboratory for the United States. (Southard had previously sponsored a bill for metric conversion of the United States.)
President Theodore Roosevelt appointed Samuel W. Stratton as the first director. The budget for the first year of operation was $40,000. The Bureau took custody of the copies of the kilogram and meter bars that were the standards for US measures, and set up a program to provide metrology services for United States scientific and commercial users. A laboratory site was constructed in Washington DC (US) and instruments were acquired from the national physical laboratories of Europe. In addition to weights and measures the Bureau developed instruments for electrical units and for measurement of light. In 1905 a meeting was called that would be the first National Conference on Weights and Measures.
Initially conceived as purely a metrology agency the Bureau of Standards was directed by Herbert Hoover to set up divisions to develop commercial standards for materials and products. Some of these standards were for products intended for government use; but product standards also affected private-sector consumption. Quality standards were developed for products including some types of clothing; automobile brake systems and headlamps; antifreeze; and electrical safety. During World War I, the Bureau worked on multiple problems related to war production even operating its own facility to produce optical glass when European supplies were cut off. Between the wars Harry Diamond of the Bureau developed a blind approach radio aircraft landing system. During World War II military research and development was carried out including development of radio propagation forecast methods; the proximity fuze and the standardized airframe used originally for Project Pigeon; and shortly afterwards the autonomously radar-guided Bat anti-ship guided bomb and the Kingfisher family of torpedo-carrying missiles.
In 1948, financed by the United States Air Force the Bureau began design and construction of SEAC: the Standards Eastern Automatic Computer. The computer went into operation in May 1950 using a combination of vacuum tubes and solid-state diode logic. About the same time the Standards Western Automatic Computer, was built at the Los Angeles office of the NBS by Harry Huskey and used for research there. A mobile version- DYSEAC- was built for the Signal Corps in 1954.
Due to a changing mission, the “National Bureau of Standards” became the “ The National Institute of Standards and Technology” in 1988.
Following September 11, 2001, NIST conducted the official investigation into the collapse of the World Trade Center buildings.
Organization
NIST is headquartered in Gaithersburg, Maryland, and operates a facility in Boulder, Colorado, which was dedicated by President Eisenhower in 1954. NIST’s activities are organized into laboratory programs and extramural programs. Effective October 1, 2010, NIST was realigned by reducing the number of NIST laboratory units from ten to six. NIST Laboratories include:
Communications Technology Laboratory (CTL)
Engineering Laboratory (EL)
Information Technology Laboratory (ITL)
Center for Neutron Research (NCNR)
Material Measurement Laboratory (MML)
Physical Measurement Laboratory (PML)
Extramural programs include:
Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP), a nationwide network of centers to assist small and mid-sized manufacturers to create and retain jobs, improve efficiencies, and minimize waste through process improvements and to increase market penetration with innovation and growth strategies;
Technology Innovation Program (TIP), a grant program where NIST and industry partners cost share the early-stage development of innovative but high-risk technologies;
Baldrige Performance Excellence Program, which administers the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award, the nation’s highest award for performance and business excellence.
NIST’s Boulder laboratories are best known for NIST‑F1 which houses an atomic clock.
NIST‑F1 serves as the source of the nation’s official time. From its measurement of the natural resonance frequency of cesium—which defines the second—NIST broadcasts time signals via longwave radio station WWVB near Fort Collins in Colorado, and shortwave radio stations WWV and WWVH, located near Fort Collins and Kekaha in Hawai’i, respectively.
NIST also operates a neutron science user facility: the NIST Center for Neutron Research (NCNR).
The NCNR provides scientists access to a variety of neutron scattering instruments which they use in many research fields (materials science; fuel cells; biotechnology etc.).
The SURF III Synchrotron Ultraviolet Radiation Facility is a source of synchrotron radiation in continuous operation since 1961.
SURF III now serves as the US national standard for source-based radiometry throughout the generalized optical spectrum. All NASA-borne extreme-ultraviolet observation instruments have been calibrated at SURF since the 1970s, and SURF is used for measurement and characterization of systems for extreme ultraviolet lithography.
The Center for Nanoscale Science and Technology performs research in nanotechnology, both through internal research efforts and by running a user-accessible cleanroom nanomanufacturing facility.
This “NanoFab” is equipped with tools for lithographic patterning and imaging (e.g., electron microscopes and atomic force microscopes).
Committees
NIST has seven standing committees:
Technical Guidelines Development Committee (TGDC)
Advisory Committee on Earthquake Hazards Reduction (ACEHR)
National Construction Safety Team Advisory Committee (NCST Advisory Committee)
Information Security and Privacy Advisory Board (ISPAB)
Visiting Committee on Advanced Technology (VCAT)
Board of Overseers for the Malcolm Baldrige National Quality Award (MBNQA Board of Overseers)
Manufacturing Extension Partnership National Advisory Board (MEPNAB)
Measurements and standards
As part of its mission, NIST supplies industry, academia, government, and other users with over 1,300 Standard Reference Materials (SRMs). These artifacts are certified as having specific characteristics or component content, used as calibration standards for measuring equipment and procedures, quality control benchmarks for industrial processes, and experimental control samples.
Handbook 44
NIST publishes the Handbook 44 each year after the annual meeting of the National Conference on Weights and Measures (NCWM). Each edition is developed through cooperation of the Committee on Specifications and Tolerances of the NCWM and the Weights and Measures Division (WMD) of the NIST. The purpose of the book is a partial fulfillment of the statutory responsibility for “cooperation with the states in securing uniformity of weights and measures laws and methods of inspection”.
NIST has been publishing various forms of what is now the Handbook 44 since 1918 and began publication under the current name in 1949. The 2010 edition conforms to the concept of the primary use of the SI (metric) measurements recommended by the Omnibus Foreign Trade and Competitiveness Act of 1988.
sciencesprings 
Reply