Tagged: Priyamvada Natarajan Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • richardmitnick 3:22 pm on January 13, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Black holes and gravitational waves, , , Priyamvada Natarajan, ,   

    From Yale: Women in STEM: “Black holes, gravitational waves take Yale prof to NASA’s LISA mission” Priyamvada Natarajan 

    Yale University bloc

    Yale University

    January 9, 2018
    Jim Shelton

    1
    Priyamvada Natarajan

    NASA has named professor of astronomy and physics Priyamvada Natarajan to its team of U.S. scientists lending expertise on gravitational waves and astrophysics for the upcoming LISA mission.

    LISA — which stands for Laser Interferometer Space Antenna — is a space-based, gravitational wave observatory that will be composed of three spacecraft separated by millions of miles. The mission, scheduled for the early 2030s, is a collaboration between NASA, the European Space Agency, and the LISA consortium.

    ESA/NASA eLISA space based the future of gravitational wave research

    Natarajan is a member of the NASA LISA Study Team.

    “The detection of gravitational waves in 2015 by the LIGO (Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory) collaboration is one of the major scientific breakthroughs of this century,” Natarajan said.


    VIRGO Gravitational Wave interferometer, near Pisa, Italy

    Caltech/MIT Advanced aLigo Hanford, WA, USA installation


    Caltech/MIT Advanced aLigo detector installation Livingston, LA, USA

    Cornell SXS, the Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes (SXS) project

    Gravitational waves. Credit: MPI for Gravitational Physics/W.Benger-Zib

    ESA/eLISA the future of gravitational wave research

    1
    Skymap showing how adding Virgo to LIGO helps in reducing the size of the source-likely region in the sky. (Credit: Giuseppe Greco (Virgo Urbino group)

    “The tremors they identified in space-time, produced by the collision of two stellar-mass black holes, was extremely challenging to detect. The more massive cousins of these black holes are supermassive black holes that reside in the centers of most, if not all, galaxies.”

    Supermassive black holes also are likely to have been built up via mergers, Natarajan explained. “The cosmic earthquakes produced during these collisions cannot be detected from the Earth and require a LIGO-like interferometer in space as these events will be detectable at much lower frequencies,” she said. “The LISA mission plans to detect these gravitational waves from space-based detectors. The mission will test our fundamental understanding of how supermassive black holes form and grow.”

    Natarajan’s research focuses on understanding the formation of the first black holes and the accumulation of mass in the most massive black holes in the universe.

    “We currently believe that black holes grow both via direct consumption of gas and stars in their vicinity, as well as via mergers with other black holes,” Natarajan said. “The detection of gravitational waves from colliding supermassive black holes by LISA would validate and calibrate the relative importance of mergers versus accretion.”

    Natarajan’s research into black holes also figures prominently in the Jan. 10 episode of the PBS science documentary series, “NOVA – Black Hole Apocalypse.”

    “My research group at Yale is extremely active and we are working at the leading edge of these questions combining theoretical models, numerical simulations, and the most up-to-date multi-wavelength observations,” Natarajan said.

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    Yale University Campus

    Yale University comprises three major academic components: Yale College (the undergraduate program), the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, and the professional schools. In addition, Yale encompasses a wide array of centers and programs, libraries, museums, and administrative support offices. Approximately 11,250 students attend Yale.

     
  • richardmitnick 7:56 am on December 11, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Astrophysicist Says Experiments Might Soon Reveal Dark Matter's 'True Nature', , , Priyamvada Natarajan,   

    From SA: Women in STEM -“Astrophysicist Says Experiments Might Soon Reveal Dark Matter’s ‘True Nature’ ” Priyamvada Natarajan 

    Scientific American

    Scientific American

    December 8, 2016
    John Horgan

    1
    Priyamvada Natarajan, shown here at Machu Picchu, Peru, on cosmology’s future: “When Copernicus re-ordered the cosmos in 1543, he could have hardly imagined that in three hundred odd years, we humans would build spacecraft – the Voyagers – that could leave the sacred confines of the solar system… so who knows what more we might figure out about the cosmos in the coming 300 years!” Credit: P. Armitage

    2
    http://alchetron.com/Priyamvada-Natarajan-282327-W

    When assessing scientific claims, science writers rely more than they care to admit on character judgments. If you like a scientist, you are more likely to take seriously her assertions, even when they bump into your biases. Priyamvada Natarajan, an astrophysicist at Yale, is a case in point. In September I hung out with her at a conference in California, where we both lectured, and later at Stevens Institute of Technology, where she gave a talk about her terrific new book Mapping the Heavens: The Radical Scientific Ideas That Reveal the Cosmos.

    2

    I found Natarajan, or “Priya,” so smart, funny and, well, sensible that she got me reconsidering my pessimism about physics and cosmology (see Further Reading). In the Q&A below, she contends that we are “poised to make an epistemic leap in terms of unraveling the true nature of dark matter.” She’s even upbeat about the prospects for detecting other universes! May her optimism prove prescient. –John Horgan

    Horgan: Why did you become an astrophysicist?

    Natarajan: Well I got seduced into becoming one! I was very inquisitive and curious as a child and it started with a fascination for maps – both terrestrial and celestial, followed by looking through a telescope for the first time and falling in love with the night sky. Carl Sagan’s Cosmos was a definite inspiration as well – it was the only time other than Star Trek that I keenly watched TV when I was young. And of course, if there was ever a key moment, it was when I got a taste for research first hand when I was in high-school working with the then Director of the Nehru Planetarium in New Delhi, the late Dr. Nirupama Raghavan. And after my undergraduate studies at MIT, while I was enrolled in a PhD at the MIT Program in Science, Technology and Society, it was a meeting and long conversation with the astrophysicist Martin Schwarzschild that helped me make the decisive move to Cambridge, England, to pursue a PhD in astrophysics. So although I knew from a young age that I wanted to be a scientist, I gravitated slowly but surely toward the choice of astrophysics well after my undergraduate studies.

    I have to say that despite it sounding a bit clichéd, the unreachable, the invisible and mysterious have always drawn me. Somehow the fact that you cannot touch the stars and cannot perform controlled experiments with the universe really intrigued me. Making sense of the cosmos scientifically, driven by data, was really where I eventually found my calling. Also, my work offers me the perfect escape from an imperfect world that I find noisy, unfair, complicated and disorderly in sharp contrast to the orderliness of the cosmos.

    Horgan: What astrophysicist, living or dead, most inspires you?

    Natarajan: There isn’t one single person that I am inspired by – there are different attributes that I admire in many of them. Albert Einstein for his intellectual audacity; Subrahmanyam Chandrashekhar for his depth of understanding and clarity; pioneering women like the Harvard astronomer Cecilia Payne-Gaposhkin for paving the way for future generations like mine; the astronomer Vera Rubin for her remarkable observational work discovering dark matter and personal encouragement of me in the early stages of my career….. Truth be told, I have found everyone that I have had the privilege to collaborate and work with to be inspiring in some way or another.

    Horgan: Has sexism been eradicated from the physical sciences?

    Natarajan: Seriously – is this a question? No, in fact, as with society as a whole it is going to be extremely difficult, if not impossible, to eradicate sexism. Alas! It is alive and well, even if not as overt as it was before. The problem is that sexism now manifests in subtle ways, and unconsciously often, so it is harder to pin down and mitigate. I fervently hope that the growing awareness will help us contain it and it will not impede the participation and progress of women in the field professionally. It would be a real shame if creative and talented women are deterred from choosing careers in the physical sciences due to sexism.

    Horgan: Will we ever know why there is something rather than nothing?

    Natarajan: We already know there is something rather than nothing. Even what we refer to as nothing – the vacuum – is replete with stuff, virtual particles that richly structure what we refer to as nothing-ness. For me, this is not the profound question, the deeper one is – why this universe?

    Horgan: Do you ever doubt whether dark matter or dark energy really exists?

    Natarajan: No, I don’t doubt that they exist, as there is incontrovertible evidence, in my opinion, from many independent cosmological probes. Let me share why I have such a strong conviction about this. It really comes from observations of clusters of galaxies.

    Galaxy Cluster Abell 1689, Credit: NASA, ESA, E. Jullo (JPL), P. Natarajan (Yale), & J.-P. Kneib (LAM, CNRS)
    Galaxy Cluster Abell 1689, Credit: NASA, ESA, E. Jullo (JPL), P. Natarajan (Yale), & J.-P. Kneib (LAM, CNRS)

    Clusters are the most massive and recently assembled objects in the universe, and a lot of my own research is focused on using them as astrophysical laboratories. The fact that no matter what worldview one adopts, whichever conception of gravity one subscribes to – a Newtonian one or an Einsteinian view–we infer the presence of copious amounts (close to 90% of the total gravitating mass) of unseen matter in clusters. If we apply Newton’s tidy laws to the motions of galaxies that constitute a cluster and are gravitationally bound to it, we find that they are whizzing around too rapidly to be just under the gravitational grip of the matter that is seen. If, on the other hand, we embrace Einstein’s interpretation, then we can use the strength of the detected light bending – gravitational lensing, the distortion produced in the shapes of distant galaxies viewed through a cluster — to infer the amount of matter needed to produce these effects.

    Gravitational Lensing NASA/ESA

    Incredibly, lensing also points to the existence of ~ 90% more matter that is invisible – more than what is seen in the stars in the cluster galaxies and X-ray emitting gas in a cluster. Remember, light bending is a tested prediction of Einstein’s Theory of General relativity. To me, the fact that these two disparate explanations point to the same mix of dark matter to visible matter in clusters is extremely compelling. And the only other alternate theory, one that dispenses with the idea of dark matter altogether and posits a modification to gravity, that has been proposed to date fails to account for the gravitational lensing that is seen. To me this is noteworthy. Clusters of galaxies offer a powerful test bed for the dark matter hypothesis.

    What I think is entirely possible is that we are off in terms of our expected properties for the dark matter particle, which might account for why they remain elusive to date. For instance, we might be searching in a swathe of parameter space (mass and interaction cross-section) that is off. We have been beholden to the idea of weakly interacting massive particles, and the neutralino as the putative dark matter particle as it is permitted within the standard model. I am optimistic though that we are really close to solving this mystery of the missing particle. This is akin to a crime scene, where we have the motive, the weapon as evidence but the body is missing! To me there are several exciting upcoming developments that I keenly look forward to in the coming 3-5 years or so that might break this intellectual impasse. One is the on-going replications of the DAMA experiment that controversially claimed a detection of dark matter more than a decade ago.

    DAMA LIBRA Dark Matter Experiment
    DAMA LIBRA Dark Matter Experiment

    Five experiments using the same sodium iodide crystal detector fabricated by the same company have been commissioned around the globe and are currently collecting data to test the original claim. In a few years we will know definitely if the DAMA result holds up with data collection and analysis from these independent groups. Second, I am excited about the current renewed vigor in axionic dark matter searches, as I think it is very promising. These experiments allow us to probe beyond the WIMP scenario. And finally, there is the intriguing theoretical idea of superfluid dark matter, that stands to be tested with current astronomical data – the rotation curves of galaxies and gravitational lensing by clusters. I think we are poised to make an epistemic leap in terms of unraveling the true nature of dark matter very soon.

    Horgan: Do you ever doubt whether black holes exist?

    Natarajan: Nope – I do not doubt that they exist. But what I find intriguing is that there are two completely distinct ways to think about them and understand them. Observational astronomers and astrophysicists like me view black holes as material objects that are compact and dense and exert detectable influence in their vicinity. For us black holes are real as they correspond to the end states of stars – stars that we see in various stages of evolution around us.

    Black hole and its accretion disk. Image credit NASA Dana Berry SkyWorks Digital
    Black hole and its accretion disk. Image credit NASA Dana Berry SkyWorks Digital

    We view supermassive black holes, that lurk stealthily in the centers of most galaxies if not all, including our own, or that power quasars, the brightest beacons in the universe, to have simply grown from smaller-mass seed black holes over cosmic time.

    Sag A*  NASA Chandra X-Ray Observatory 23 July 2014, the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way
    Sag A* NASA Chandra X-Ray Observatory 23 July 2014, the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way

    Binary black hole system in quasar OJ 287. Credit Gary Poyner
    Binary black hole system in quasar OJ 287. Credit Gary Poyner

    And for theoretical physicists and relativists, black holes are a mathematical construct, an exact solution of Einstein’s equations. These two apparently divergent views need to coalesce and will, once the gaps in our understanding have been bridged. In fact, I think this seemingly incommensurate view of black holes is an excellent example of what the historian of science Peter Galison has referred to as a trading zone – an intellectual space wherein disparate conceptual views converge and can be synthesized. And of course, the detection of gravitational waves from two merging black holes earlier this year by the LIGO collaboration confirms that they are not only real but also behave as predicted by Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity.

    LIGO bloc new
    Caltech/MIT Advanced aLigo Hanford, WA, USA installation
    Caltech/MIT Advanced aLigo Hanford, WA, USA installation
    Caltech/MIT Advanced aLigo detector installation Livingston, LA, USA
    Caltech/MIT Advanced aLigo detector installation Livingston, LA, USA

    Cornell SXS, the Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes (SXS) project
    Cornell SXS, the Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes (SXS) project

    Gravitational waves. Credit: MPI for Gravitational Physics/W.Benger-Zib
    Credit: MPI for Gravitational Physics/W.Benger-Zib

    Horgan: Will multiverses always remain untestable speculation?

    Natarajan: At the moment, it seems like the idea of the multiverse is untestable, perhaps even by construction. However, there is work underway on exploring potential signatures that might leave enigmatic fingerprints on the relic radiation from the hot and dense beginning of our universe – the cosmic microwave background [C<B] – perhaps some echoes of a collision with another bubble universe?

    CMB per ESA/Planck
    CMB per ESA/Planck

    ESA/Planck
    ESA/Planck

    Look, I have an extremely open mind about this idea, and most scientific ideas actually. One just has to look back in history to get a sense of how far we have come and how unpredictable our path of radical discoveries has been. When Copernicus re-ordered the cosmos (well, our solar system was the cosmos then) in 1543, he could have hardly imagined that in three hundred odd years, we humans would build spacecraft – the Voyagers – that could leave the sacred confines of the solar system.

    NASA/Voyager 1
    NASA/Voyager 1

    So, where our discoveries will lead us in the future is not something I can hazard a guess about. The human mind and its cognitive capacity is incredible, so who knows what more we might figure out about the cosmos in the coming 300 years!

    Horgan: Do you take seriously the idea that the universe is a simulation?

    Natarajan: No, I don’t take this idea seriously. I do not, as I do not see why it is intellectually stimulating or even useful.

    Horgan: Some prominent physicists have called philosophy obsolete. Has philosophy been useful to your scientific work?

    Natarajan: First, there is philosophy as an intellectual activity, which is somewhat different from how it is parceled into the academic discipline. Philosophy to me is an intellectual stance. It helps dissect how we frame and think about foundational questions about the creation of knowledge, so it inevitably informs my worldview and therefore my scientific work.

    Horgan: Do you think our ideas about the universe might appear as wrong to future scientists as the ideas of Aristotle and Ptolemy seem to us?

    Natarajan: Sure, they might seem naïve, and lacking in explanatory power to future scientists given their comprehension of the cosmos. But I think they would still see us as an essential part of the narrative of the arc of scientific discovery.

    Horgan: Are you religious?

    Natarajan: No, I am not – I do not practice any religion. I was born and brought up as a Hindu. Hinduism consists of several distinct philosophical schools, and one of them, Advaita, is a materialist, non-theist one that I find intriguing and compelling. My parents encouraged us to learn Sanskrit and read philosophical texts in the original. I love the Sanskrit language and have read the Bhagavad Gita and several of the Upanishads. They left it to us to figure out what role religious belief might or might not play in our lives.

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    Scientific American, the oldest continuously published magazine in the U.S., has been bringing its readers unique insights about developments in science and technology for more than 160 years.

     
c
Compose new post
j
Next post/Next comment
k
Previous post/Previous comment
r
Reply
e
Edit
o
Show/Hide comments
t
Go to top
l
Go to login
h
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
Cancel
%d bloggers like this: