Tagged: Glaciers Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • richardmitnick 11:11 am on August 22, 2018 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Glaciers, , Tamara Pico, The Hudson River,   

    From Harvard Gazette: Women in STEM -“Tracking rivers to read ancient glaciers” Tamara Pico 

    Harvard University
    Harvard University

    From Harvard Gazette

    Tamara Pico is lead author of a new study that estimates how Ice Age glaciers moved by examining how the weight of the North American ice sheet altered topography and led to changes in the course of rivers. Jon Chase/Harvard Staff Photographer

    Long-ago changes along the Hudson may provide evidence of how ice sheets grew.

    In a kind of geological mystery, scientists have known for decades that a massive ice sheet stretched to cover most of Canada and much of the northeastern U.S. 25,000 years ago. What’s been trickier to pin down is how — and especially how quickly — it reached its ultimate size.

    One clue to answering that, Tamara Pico said, may involve changes to the Hudson River.

    Pico, who is a Graduate School of Arts and Sciences Ph.D. student working in the group led by Jerry Mitrovica, the Frank B. Baird Jr. Professor of Science, is the lead author of a study that estimates how glaciers moved by examining how the weight of the ice sheet altered topography and led to changes in the river’s course. The study is described in a July paper published in Geology.

    “The Hudson River has changed course multiple times over the last million years,” Pico said. “The last time was about 30,000 years ago, just before the last glacial maximum, when it moved to the east.

    “That ancestral channel has been dated and mapped … and the way the ice sheet connects to this is: As it is growing, it’s loading the crust it’s sitting on. The Earth is like bread dough on these time scales, so as it gets depressed under the ice sheet, the region around it bulges upward. In fact, we call it the peripheral bulge. The Hudson is sitting on this bulge, and as it’s lifted up and tilted, the river can be forced to change directions.”

    To develop a system that could connect the growth of the ice sheet with changes in the Hudson’s direction, Pico began with a model for how the Earth deforms in response to various loads.

    “So we can say, if there’s an ice sheet over Canada, I can predict the land in New York City to be uplifted by X many meters,” she said. “What we did was create a number of different ice histories that show how the ice sheet might have grown, each of which predicts a certain pattern of uplift, and then we can model how the river might have evolved in response to that upwelling.”

    The result, Pico said, is a model that may for the first time be able to use the changes in natural features in the landscape to measure the growth of ice sheets.

    “This is the first time a study has used the change in a river’s direction to understand which ice history is most likely,” she said. “There’s very little data about how the ice sheet grew because as it grows it acts like a bulldozer and scrapes everything away to the edges. We have plenty of information about how the ice retreats, because it deposits debris as it melts back, but we don’t get that type of record as the ice is advancing.”

    Source: “Glacial isostatic adjustment deflects the path of the ancestral Hudson River,” T. Pico, J.X. Mitrovica, J. Braun, K.L. Ferrier

    What little data scientists do have about how the ice sheet grew, Pico said, comes from data about sea level during the period, and suggests that the ice sheet over Canada, particularly in the eastern part of the country, remained relatively small for a long period, and then suddenly began to grow quickly.

    “In a way, this study is motivated by that, because it’s asking: Can we use evidence for a change in river direction … to test whether the ice sheet grew quickly or slowly?” she said. “We can only ask that question because these areas were never covered by ice, so this record is preserved. We can use evidence in the landscape and the rivers to say something about the ice sheet, even though this area was never covered by ice.”

    While the study offers strong suggestive evidence that the technique works, Pico said there is still a great deal of work to be done to confirm that the findings are solid.

    “This is the first time this has been done, so we need to do more work to explore how the river responds to this type of uplift and understand what we should be looking for in the landscape,” she said. “But I think it’s extremely exciting because we are so limited in what we know about ice sheets before the last glacial maximum. We don’t know how fast they grew. If we don’t know that, we don’t know how stable they are.”

    Going forward, Pico said she is working to apply the technique to several other rivers along the Eastern Seaboard, including the Delaware, Potomac, and Susquehanna, all of which show signs of rapid change during the same period.

    “There is some evidence that rivers experienced very unusual changes that are no doubt related to this process,” she said. “The Delaware may have actually reversed slope, and the Potomac and Susquehanna both show a large increase in erosion in some areas, suggesting the water was moving much faster.”

    In the long run, Pico said, the study may help researchers rewrite their understanding of how quickly the landscape can change and how rivers and other natural features respond.

    “For me, this work is about trying to connect the evidence on land to the history of glaciation to show the community that this process — what we call glacial isostatic adjustment — can really impact rivers,” Pico said. “People most often think of rivers as stable features of the landscape that remain fixed over very long, million-year time scales, but we can show that these Ice Age effects can alter the landscape on millennial time scales. The ice sheet grows, the Earth deforms, and rivers respond.”

    See the full article here .


    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    Stem Education Coalition

    Harvard University campus
    Harvard is the oldest institution of higher education in the United States, established in 1636 by vote of the Great and General Court of the Massachusetts Bay Colony. It was named after the College’s first benefactor, the young minister John Harvard of Charlestown, who upon his death in 1638 left his library and half his estate to the institution. A statue of John Harvard stands today in front of University Hall in Harvard Yard, and is perhaps the University’s best known landmark.

    Harvard University has 12 degree-granting Schools in addition to the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study. The University has grown from nine students with a single master to an enrollment of more than 20,000 degree candidates including undergraduate, graduate, and professional students. There are more than 360,000 living alumni in the U.S. and over 190 other countries.

  • richardmitnick 3:02 pm on March 2, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Glaciers   

    From AGU: “Characterizing Interglacial Periods over the Past 800,000 Years” 

    Eos news bloc


    2 March 2016
    Cody Sullivan, Writer Intern

    Glacier. Credit Matito CC BY SA 2.0
    Glacier. credit Matito CC BY SA 2.0

    Global climate patterns have undergone a remarkable shift in the past 600,000 to 1.2 million years. Before the transition, glacial cycles, consisting of cold ice ages and milder interludes, typically lasted about 40,000 years—but those weaker cycles gave way to longer-lasting icy eras with cycles lasting roughly 100,000 years. In between the cold ice ages are periods of thawing and warming known as interglacial periods, during which sea levels rise and ice retreats. Here Past Interglacials Working Group of PAGES identifies and compares interglacial periods over the past 800,000 years, including our current era.

    Glacial periods give way to interglacials on some occasions when the Northern Hemisphere’s summer solar insolation (the amount of solar radiation received by Earth’s surface) increases alongside corresponding decreases in ice volume and increases in temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2). Although the end of an interglacial period is a slow process requiring the sequential reversal of these conditions, the onset of an interglacial period can be relatively fast. Within the glacial periods, there are secondary fluctuations. These are known as interstadial and stadial periods, which occur when glaciers retreat and advance, respectively.

    Despite the occurrence of interstadials and stadials, the researchers evaluated the overall strength of interglacials. In total, the researchers identified 11 different interglacials during the study period. In addition, using sea surface temperature and other data, they found that two interglacial periods in particular—marine isotopic stage (MIS) 5 and MIS 11–were particularly strong almost everywhere.

    Although most interglacials typically last about 10,000 to 30,000 years, the researchers suggest that the current epoch—the Holocene—may last much longer because of the increased levels of atmospheric greenhouse gases resulting from human activity. The authors predict that this current interglacial period won’t give way to a glacial period for another 50,000 years or so. The only way the current interglacial could end earlier is if CO2 levels were reduced to well below preindustrial levels. (Reviews of Geophysics, doi:10.1002/2015RG000482, 2015)

    Citation: Sullivan, C. (2016), Characterizing interglacial periods over the past 800,000 years, Eos, 97, doi:10.1o29/2016EO047001. Published on 2 March 2016.

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    Eos is the leading source for trustworthy news and perspectives about the Earth and space sciences and their impact. Its namesake is Eos, the Greek goddess of the dawn, who represents the light shed on understanding our planet and its environment in space by the Earth and space sciences.

  • richardmitnick 3:39 pm on January 2, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Glaciers,   

    From Nautilus: “How To Clock a Glacier” March 2015 



    March 12, 2015
    Matthew R. Francis
    Illustration by Francesco Izzo

    Temp 1
    Francesco Izzo. Purchase here.

    A low-flying airplane buzzes along the coast of Greenland, hovering over a glacier. The belly of the plane holds a laser that bounces light off the glacier’s face. As the light beam returns to the plane, it enters a black box that slows it to a crawl, turning it into a moment-by-moment report on the glacier’s speed. Each flight, each glacier measured, allows researchers to map the diminishment of the Greenland ice cap. Similar planes skirt Antarctica and the coast of Alaska, charting the damage to the ice cover.

    These airplanes and their experimental equipment don’t exist yet. But the need to measure glacier flow in real time does exist. The latest report by Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) projected that melting ice may result in as much as one meter of sea-level rise by the year 2100, threatening millions of people in low-lying nations and coastal cities. Knowing how glaciers melt can help researchers predict the future. But glaciers are, well, glacial. Most of them creep roughly two to three kilometers each year, covering less distance than most of us can walk in an hour. The fastest ice flow in Greenland is the glacier Jakobshavn, which moves at the blazingly slow speed of about 16 kilometers in a year—about 180 centimeters per hour.

    Currently, there’s no good way for ice scientists to measure such slow velocities in one measurement. All available methods require two takes—researchers measure the position of the ice face at different times and subtract them to get the average speed. In the old days, researchers would stick pegs at the edge of the ice and come back later in the year to see how far the ice moved. Today, these results can be achieved by radar-carrying planes that measure positions of glacier fronts, but this method also requires a return visit to average the speed. University of Colorado Boulder ice scientist Twila Moon relies on pictures taken by various satellites, which fly over Greenland and Antarctica at fixed times, but they also have to make two passes for a single measurement, and clouds can obstruct their view. “Sometimes you can wait months to get readings from one area,” Moon says. “For some areas we don’t get readings at all.”

    Temp 2
    Glacier-o-meter needed: Two small glaciers (right), near Ilulisat, Greenland meet the ocean (left), which is covered with sea ice.Twila Moon

    Not only does the two-take technique require double the effort, but glaciers also advance and retreat irregularly, details which current tracking methods can’t capture. “Understanding ice sheet velocity is critical because the velocity is a key variable for understanding how much ice we are losing,” Moon says. “If we were able to get velocity data in a single look, the quantity and accuracy of the data would increase.”

    The question is, how do you measure something that is moving as slowly as a glacier? To solve this challenge, University of Nice Sophia Antipolis physicist Umberto Bortolozzo and his colleagues turned not to something very slow, but to something very fast—light.

    When a blaring siren moves toward us, its sound waves get bunched up, resulting in a higher pitch. Radar guns (like the kind used by the highway patrol) exploit this phenomenon, called the Doppler Effect, by bouncing radio waves off a car moving toward them to measure its speed. The faster the car is moving, the more the returning waves get bunched, reducing their wavelength. While a normal radar gun can’t measure very slow speeds, Bortolozzo and his colleagues are experimenting with a radar type that can.

    They began by splitting a laser beam into two. One beam bounces off the slow-moving target whose speed is to be measured, a glacier for example, shifting its wavelength very slightly via the Doppler Effect. This color-shifted beam is then combined with the second beam inside a liquid crystal consisting of long, helical-shape molecules mixed with a dye. The dye molecules change their shape when they interact with the light, slowing it down to a speed less than one millimeter per second.

    At full speed, the very small wavelength difference between the two light beams could not be detected. But the slow passage of the mixed beams through the liquid crystal strengthens their interaction (by increasing the so-called optical path distance), allowing the wavelength difference, and the target’s speed, to be measured.

    In the lab, Bortolozzo and his coworkers have been able to detect speeds as slow as 20 millionths of a billionth of a meter per second (20 femtometers per second) with a measurement lasting only one second. This is more than sufficient for glaciers, which, on average, move on the order of a few millionths of a meter each second.

    Temp 3
    I’m melting!: An iceberg from Jakobshavn Glacier is slowly melting in the ocean near Ilulissat, Greenland. One of the fastest flowing Greenland glaciers, Jakobshavn produces many large icebergs, which contribute to sea level rise.Twila Moon

    Unlike other slow-light techniques, that require cryogenic temperatures, this light-slowing method is easier to turn into practical use because it can be done at room temperature. That means any technology derived from these methods could be taken into the field without the need to carry liquid helium and bulky refrigeration units. Researchers hope this equipment can one day be loaded into an airplane that would circle the Greenland glaciers.

    Moon hopes that day arrives reasonably soon. “If they can create an instrument that works like that and I can put it on the plane or an unmanned flying vehicle or a satellite, that would be great for our field,” Moon says. “Having such instruments would help decrease the uncertainty of how much sea level rise we are going to see and how quickly it’s going to happen.”

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    Welcome to Nautilus. We are delighted you joined us. We are here to tell you about science and its endless connections to our lives. Each month we choose a single topic. And each Thursday we publish a new chapter on that topic online. Each issue combines the sciences, culture and philosophy into a single story told by the world’s leading thinkers and writers. We follow the story wherever it leads us. Read our essays, investigative reports, and blogs. Fiction, too. Take in our games, videos, and graphic stories. Stop in for a minute, or an hour. Nautilus lets science spill over its usual borders. We are science, connected.

  • richardmitnick 3:46 pm on December 27, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: American Geophysical Union, , Glaciers   

    From AGU: “Kanchenjunga Glacier, Nepal Volume Losses 

    AGU bloc

    American Geophysical Union

    Figure 10-16. Kanchenjunga Glacier (K) from 1991 to 2015, green arrows indicate locations of enhanced supraglacial lakes since 1991. Purple arrow indicates areas of thinning at higher elevations in the region. Location 2 is the main junction area.

    Kanchenjunga Glacier is the main glacier draining west from Kanchenjunga Peak, also listed on maps as Kumbukarni. The glacier is similar to Zemu Glacier flowing east from the same mountain into Sikkim, in the heavy debris cover that dominates the glacier in the ablation zone extending from the terminus for 15 km and an altitude of 5600 m. Identifying the retreat is difficult due to the debris cover. Racoviteanu et al (2015) examined glaciers in this region using 1962 and 2000 imagery. They found area losses of 14% for debris covered glacier and 34% for clean glaciers. The debris covered glaciers terminus response is even more muted indicating why terminus change is an easy measure of glacier change but not always the best. For Kanchenjunga Glacier Racoviteanu et al (2015) indicate the glacier area declined by just 4-8% from 1962-2000.

    What is apparent in the Landsat images at the green arrows is the increase from 1991 to 2015 of supraglacial lakes.

    NASA LandSat 8
    Landsat 8

    Also features of thinning are evident in the mid reaches of the glacier, purple arrows, where tributaries have narrowed and detached from the main glacier. A closeup of the main glacier junction 12 km above the terminus indicates the number of large supraglacial lakes. These cannot form in a region where melting does not dominate over glacier motion. The Google Earth image from 2014 of the terminus area indicates a patchwork of moraine cored ice dotted with supraglacial lakes and dissected by the glacial outlet river in the lower 3 km of the glacier. This is clearly not an active portion of the glacier, it is thin not moving and does not fill even the valley floor. An overlay of images indicates the lack of motion. The heavy debris cover has slowed retreat and thinning, however, the lower glacier is poised for an increased rate of retreat with merging of supraglacial lakes, which will lead to further area losses. The Kanchenjunga Glacier is losing volume like all other 41 glaciers examined in detail and linked at the Himalayan Glacier Index page.

    Google Earth image of the main glacier junction region (2) Supraglacial lakes in the area of at 5200 m.

    Temp 1
    Google Earth image of supraglacial lakes 2-5 km above the terminus and the region along the north margin of the glacier where the glacier is receding from the lateral moraine.

    Temp 2
    2014 Google Earth image of terminus reach. Black arrows indicate ice cored moraine, blue arrow the lowest large supraglacial lake, 2.5 km above the terminus and red arrow the last remnant of ice.

    See the full post here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    The purpose of the American Geophysical Union is to promote discovery in Earth and space science for the benefit of humanity.

    To achieve this mission, AGU identified the following core values and behaviors.

    Core Principles

    As an organization, AGU holds a set of guiding core values:

    The scientific method
    The generation and dissemination of scientific knowledge
    Open exchange of ideas and information
    Diversity of backgrounds, scientific ideas and approaches
    Benefit of science for a sustainable future
    International and interdisciplinary cooperation
    Equality and inclusiveness
    An active role in educating and nurturing the next generation of scientists
    An engaged membership
    Unselfish cooperation in research
    Excellence and integrity in everything we do

    When we are at our best as an organization, we embody these values in our behavior as follows:

    We advance Earth and space science by catalyzing and supporting the efforts of individual scientists within and outside the membership.
    As a learned society, we serve the public good by fostering quality in the Earth and space science and by publishing the results of research.
    We welcome all in academic, government, industry and other venues who share our interests in understanding the Earth, planets and their space environment, or who seek to apply this knowledge to solving problems facing society.
    Our scientific mission transcends national boundaries.
    Individual scientists worldwide are equals in all AGU activities.
    Cooperative activities with partner societies of all sizes worldwide enhance the resources of all, increase the visibility of Earth and space science, and serve individual scientists, students, and the public.
    We are our members.
    Dedicated volunteers represent an essential ingredient of every program.
    AGU staff work flexibly and responsively in partnership with volunteers to achieve our goals and objectives.

  • richardmitnick 12:52 pm on December 25, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Glaciers   

    From Eos: “World’s Smallest Glaciers Risk Vanishing in Warm Climate” 

    Eos news bloc


    24 December 2015
    JoAnna Wendel

    A scientist walks along Corvatsch Glacier in eastern Switzerland in September 2015. Scientists have found that the majority of Switzerland’s glaciers will vanish by 2025. Credit: Matthias Huss

    The next few decades do not bode well for the world’s smallest glaciers. These tiny glaciers, less than half a square kilometer, dot mountains all over the world and account for 80%–90% of the globe’s mountain glacier population. But as temperatures rise, scientists worry that these glaciers will all but disappear.

    Even if they seem insignificant because of their size, these glaciers “respond very quickly and therefore they can contribute significantly, even on the global level, in terms of sea level rise for the next decade,” said Matthias Huss, senior lecturer at the University of Fribourg in Switzerland and lead scientist in the research.

    Dynamics of Very Small Glaciers

    Larger glaciers of the world stretch and grow under the weight of accumulating snowfall, but small glaciers depend more on snow blown in from a storm or avalanche and generally stick to one place. In essence, they are like large “ice patches,” Huss said.

    During hot summers, these very small glaciers lose mass in the form of meltwater, which feeds streams and irrigation systems in the valleys below. On average, the glaciers grow about 1.5–2 meters every winter and shrink about 2.5–3 meters every summer. In a particularly hot summer, a very small glacier can lose up to 20% of its mass, Huss said.

    Images of the Pizol Glacier in the Swiss Alps taken (top) in 2006 and (bottom) in 2011 illustrate just how quickly these very small glaciers can disappear. Credit: Matthias Huss

    In the past few decades, scientists have noted that these glaciers are trending towards losing more mass than they gain. Twice a year for the past several years, Huss and his team visited 10 glaciers around Switzerland to monitor their mass gain and loss. They applied their measurements to a mathematical model that also incorporated data from the 1970s. The model showed that Switzerland’s 1133 glaciers are in great peril and most of them risk completely vanishing by 2025.

    The models produced similar results when they were applied globally—in the next couple of decades, very small glaciers are at a great risk of disappearing completely, Huss reported last week at the Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union in San Francisco, Calif.

    Worldwide Trend

    The acceleration of glacier mass loss isn’t exclusive to very small glaciers—even the world’s larger mountain glaciers have been shrinking, according to a 2014 state of the climate report in the Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society. Since the 1980s, the report said, mountain glaciers worldwide have lost a meltwater equivalent of 16.8 meters—which is like slicing 18.5 meters off the top of any given glacier—and this rate of melt is accelerating.

    However, “in terms of the global retreat of glaciers, the small glaciers are responding the fastest to the recent climate change,” said Valentina Radic, an assistant professor at the University of British Columbia. She studies how climate change affects glaciers but wasn’t involved in this study.

    Very small glaciers “are good indicators of what’s actually happening because they respond fast to the recent changes, giving us a good overview of what is happening to the present climate,” Radic said. Large glaciers may take hundreds of years to respond to shifts in the climate, while small glaciers may only take a decade or two.

    Furthermore, Huss said, as larger glaciers melt because of rising temperatures, they still supply water to streams and irrigation systems. But these small, extrasensitive glaciers can disappear in a geologic flash, suddenly cutting off the water supply and exposing bare, mountain rock, which crumbles and can become a natural hazard.

    They may not be mighty in size or even influential in the grand scheme of global climate change, but humans and animals alike depend on these small glaciers’ annual melt for water, and their disappearance could put a small but significant dent in sea level rise. The researchers estimate that if all the very small glaciers disappeared, they could contribute about 7% to the total impact that glacier melt has on sea level rise.

    “Glaciologists would probably laugh about us because we are interested in these ‘ice patches,’” Huss said. But even if these very small glaciers are not relevant for the changes expected by the end of the 21st century, “they are relevant for the next few decades.”

    Citation: Wendel, J. (2015), World’s smallest glaciers risk vanishing in warm climate, Eos, 96, doi:10.1029/2015EO042411. Published on 24 December 2015.

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    Eos is the leading source for trustworthy news and perspectives about the Earth and space sciences and their impact. Its namesake is Eos, the Greek goddess of the dawn, who represents the light shed on understanding our planet and its environment in space by the Earth and space sciences.

  • richardmitnick 11:01 am on October 11, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Glaciers, , NASA Landsat 8   

    From NASA Earth: “Malaspina Glacier, Alaska” 

    NASA Earth Observatory

    NASA Earth Observatory

    acquired September 24, 2014

    The ice of a piedmont glacier spills from a steep valley onto a relatively flat plain, where it spreads out unconstrained like pancake batter. Elephant Foot Glacier in northeastern Greenland is an excellent example; it is particularly noted for its symmetry. But the largest piedmont glacier in North America (and possibly the world) is Malaspina in southeastern Alaska.

    On September 24, 2014, the Operational Land Imager (OLI) on Landsat 8 acquired this image of Malaspina Glacier.

    NASA Landsat 8 OLI

    NASA LandSat 8
    NASA LandSat 8

    The main source of ice comes from Seward Glacier, located at the top-center of this image. The Agassiz and Libbey glaciers are visible on the left side, and the Hayden and Marvine glaciers are on the right.

    The brown lines on the ice are moraines—areas where soil, rock, and other debris have been scraped up by the glacier and deposited at its sides. Where two glaciers flow together, the moraines merge to form a medial moraine. Glaciers that flow at a steady speed tend to have moraines that are relatively straight.

    But what causes the dizzying pattern of curves, zigzags, and loops of Malaspina’s moraines? Glaciers in this area of Alaska periodically “surge,”meaning they lurch forward quickly for one to several years. As a result of this irregular flow, the moraines at the edges and between glaciers can become folded, compressed, and sheared to form the characteristic loops seen on Malaspina. For instance, a surge in 1986 displaced moraines on the east side of Malaspina by as much as 5 kilometers (3 miles).

    See the full article for the list of references with links.

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    The Earth Observatory’s mission is to share with the public the images, stories, and discoveries about climate and the environment that emerge from NASA research, including its satellite missions, in-the-field research, and climate models. The Earth Observatory staff is supported by the Climate and Radiation Laboratory, and the Hydrospheric and Biospheric Sciences Laboratory located at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center.

  • richardmitnick 4:00 am on March 26, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Glaciers,   

    From phys.org: “‘Ice vault’ idea to keep climate’s time capsule intact” 


    March 26, 2015
    Catherine Hours

    A researcher analysing samples at the Laboratory for Glaciology and the Geophysics of the Environment, in Grenoble, southeastern France, in 2008

    Imagine you are Sherlock Holmes bent on solving a mystery but the evidence is starting to crumble and eventually you will be left with worthless dust.

    This is the worry which haunts ice scientists delving into Earth’s threatened glaciers.

    Deep inside them, the slumbering ice slabs hold information about Earth’s climate past, and pointers for the future.

    The frozen archive is formed from compacted layers snow which fell hundreds, thousands or even hundreds of thousands of years ago.

    Learning more about the past through examining the glaciers could help us predict how our planet will respond when global warming kicks into higher gear—just decades from now, if predictions are right.

    Only a tiny amount of this glacial material has ever been extracted and examined.

    And as temperatures rise, the fringes of many glaciers are softening to mush, threatening the survival of this precious testament.

    “We are the only scientific community working on climate history whose research material is disappearing,” lamented Jerome Chappellaz at the Laboratory for Glaciology and the Geophysics of the Environment in Grenoble, southeastern France.

    “It is time to do something—we have to act now, while the glaciers are still a useable source.”

    That “something” is a new scheme to build a vault for ice cores extracted by scientists from the deep chill of Antarctica.

    About 50-130 millimetres (two to five inches) wide, in sections between one to six metres (a yard to 20 feet) long, ice cores are glaciology’s mainstay.

    Within them are telltale bubbles of gas, notably the greenhouse-gas carbon dioxide (CO2).

    By studying them, “past eras can be reconstructed, showing how and why climate changed, and how it might change in the future,” says the US National Snow and Ice Data Center.

    Jerome Chappellaz, senior scientist at the National Center for Scientific Research, working at the Laboratory for Glaciology and the Geophysics of the Environment in Grenoble, southeastern France, examines an ice sample

    The deepest-ever core, drilled in Antarctica, is 3,270 metres long, and revealed the world has gone through eight ice ages over about 800,000 years.

    These cycles, which profoundly affect life on our planet, generally move in lockstep with greenhouse gases.

    Until the start of the Industrial Revolution in the mid-18th century, these heat-trapping gases had natural causes.

    The deepest-ever core, drilled in Antarctica, is 3,270 metres long, and revealed the world has gone through eight ice ages over about 800,000 years.

    These cycles, which profoundly affect life on our planet, generally move in lockstep with greenhouse gases.

    Until the start of the Industrial Revolution in the mid-18th century, these heat-trapping gases had natural causes.

    Learning more about the past through examining glaciers could help us predict how our planet will respond when global warming kicks into higher gear, scientists say

    They are casting around for funding and sponsorships.

    The UN’s Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (Unesco) is considering joining the initiative.

    “We support the idea although at this stage, we haven’t really figured out how we can provide it,” said Anil Mishra of Unesco’s International Hydrological Programme.

    Mountain glacier cores, as opposed to ice sheet cores, are generally 100 to 150 metres deep.

    They provide more recent snapshots of climate but invaluable local insights.

    They can shed light on how different mountain regions respond to sharp swings in temperature, weather patterns and atmospheric pollutants such as soot—a useful tip in tackling flood risk and securing water supplies.

    The first contributions to the vault will come next year, from the Col du Dome, a site 4,300 metres high on Mont-Blanc, Europe’s highest peak, and more will come in 2017 from the Illimani glacier, 6,300 metres above the Bolivian capital of La Paz.

    The scheme’s organisers are hoping that American, Chinese, Italian, Swiss and South American researchers will also contribute cores.

    Future generations may learn even more from the capsules than current science allows, said Chappellaz.

    “A few centuries from now, who knows what kind of technology may be available for analysing the cores?” he asked.

    See the full article here.

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    About Phys.org in 100 Words

    Phys.org™ (formerly Physorg.com) is a leading web-based science, research and technology news service which covers a full range of topics. These include physics, earth science, medicine, nanotechnology, electronics, space, biology, chemistry, computer sciences, engineering, mathematics and other sciences and technologies. Launched in 2004, Phys.org’s readership has grown steadily to include 1.75 million scientists, researchers, and engineers every month. Phys.org publishes approximately 100 quality articles every day, offering some of the most comprehensive coverage of sci-tech developments world-wide. Quancast 2009 includes Phys.org in its list of the Global Top 2,000 Websites. Phys.org community members enjoy access to many personalized features such as social networking, a personal home page set-up, RSS/XML feeds, article comments and ranking, the ability to save favorite articles, a daily newsletter, and other options.

  • richardmitnick 1:41 pm on February 3, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Glaciers,   

    From Symmetry: “Tracking glaciers with accelerators” 


    February 03, 2015
    Kelen Tuttle

    To predict Earth’s future, geologists use particle accelerators to understand its past.


    Geologists once thought that, until about 18,000 years ago, a mammoth glacier covered the top two-thirds of Ireland. Recently, however, they found evidence that it wasn’t just the top two-thirds: The Irish glacier was much larger, completely engulfing the country and extending far offshore.

    They learned this with the help of a particle accelerator.

    Glaciers are always on the move, advancing or retreating as fast as 30 meters a day or as slow as half a meter a year. During the most recent ice age, huge glaciers spread over much of Earth’s northern climes, extending all the way from the northern tip of Greenland to Cape Cod and across to Chicago, which was buried under a kilometer of ice. It was the same in Europe, with parts of the British Isles, Germany, Poland and Russia all hidden beneath an enormous ice sheet.

    “For the last 2.5 million years of Earth’s history, we’ve had this pattern of alternating ice ages and interglacials,” says Fred Phillips, a professor in New Mexico Tech’s Department of Earth and Environmental Science who, among other things, is an expert at dating the movements of glaciers.

    “Trying to understand these cycles—to understand geographical distribution of climate fluctuations and trying to pin down the chronology—has preoccupied scientists for 200 years now.”

    Over the past 30 years, scientists have begun to use particle accelerators to help them track how these glaciers move.

    The process begins with a globetrotting geologist and some huge rocks. As a glacier recedes, it will sometimes pluck a boulder from its depths and push it into daylight. While trapped beneath the ice, the boulder is shielded from the barrage of cosmic rays that continuously assaults Earth’s surface. But as soon as the boulder is exposed, cosmic rays begin to interact with the atoms inside the rock, rapidly producing rare isotopes called cosmogenic nuclides, such as helium-3, neon-21 or beryllium-10.

    To determine just how long ago the boulder was forced to the surface, geologists like Phillips use a hammer and chisel—or, sometimes, rock saws and small explosive devices—to remove a chunk of rock about the size of a grapefruit. They bring that sample back to the lab, grind it up and extract one specific mineral, such as quartz, that produces cosmogenic nuclides at a known rate.

    1. Geologists in Antarctica use a hammer and chisel to sample the upper few centimeters of a boulder for cosmogenic nuclide dating.

    2. Bethan Davies samples a boulder for cosmogenic nuclide dating in Greenland.
    Courtesy of: David Roberts and Bethan Davies, http://www.AntarcticGlaciers.org

    After isolating one particular nuclide from that mineral, they send a beam of cesium ions at the sample. That adds an extra electron to atoms within the sample, forming negative elemental or molecular ions. These ions are sent into an accelerator beam and smashed through a thin foil or gas, which strips them of electrons and destroys any remaining molecules. Finally, the ions are sent into a detector that counts the ratio of unstable to stable atoms, revealing the amount of cosmogenic nuclides. The more cosmogenic nuclides in the sample, the more time has elapsed since the glacier ejected the boulder.

    The original idea for this type of geological dating came from none other than Raymond Davis Jr., the Brookhaven National Laboratory nuclear chemist who won a Nobel Prize for detecting neutrinos streaming from the sun. Davis came up with the idea working in collaboration with Oliver Schaeffer, an expert in the environmental production of background radioactivity.

    Although the duo correctly set forth the basic experimental concept for using cosmogenic nuclides to date rock samples in the mid-1950s, it took nearly 30 years for detector technologies to catch up with their ideas. Once possible, the technique took off. “Since the mid-1980s, there have been thousands of scientific papers published on glacial chronologies and other geological dating using this method,” Phillips says.

    Today, Phillips says, significant effort is being made to understand the rise and fall of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet.

    “This is important because it looks like now this ice sheet is in a state of slow collapse, which could raise sea level by about 5 meters,” he says. “Understanding what controls the extent of that ice is critically important.”

    By understanding the past, researchers like Phillips might better understand what’s to come.

    See the full article here.

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    Symmetry is a joint Fermilab/SLAC publication.

  • richardmitnick 4:41 am on January 15, 2015 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Glaciers   

    From Discovery: “How Greenland Got Its Glaciers” 

    Discovery News
    Discovery News

    Jan 14, 2015
    Laura Geggel

    Gunbjörn Fjeld, part of the Watkins Mountains in southern East Greenland, is the country’s highest peak, at 2.3 miles (3.7 kilometers) above sea level.

    Greenland is famous for its massive glaciers, but the region was relatively free of ice until about 2.7 million years ago, according to a new study. Before then, the Northern Hemisphere had been mostly ice-free for more than 500 million years, the researchers said.

    The Greenland ice sheet began building after plate tectonics and the Earth’s shifting tilt reshaped the region, the researchers found. The team narrowed the cause down to three factors: plate tectonics that lifted the region, creating soaring snow-capped mountain peaks; a northward drift from plate tectonics; and a shift in the Earth’s axis that caused Greenland to move farther north, away from the sun’s warmth.

    “Our work was motivated by the question of why extensive glaciations of Greenland started only during the past few million years,” the researchers wrote in the study.

    About 60 million years ago, a plume from the Earth’s mantle, several layers below the planet’s upper crust, thinned out part of Greenland’s lithosphere above it.

    The key principle of plate tectonics is that the lithosphere exists as separate and distinct tectonic plates, which float on the fluid-like (visco-elastic solid) asthenosphere. The relative fluidity of the asthenosphere allows the tectonic plates to undergo motion in different directions. This map shows 15 of the largest plates. Note that the Indo-Australian Plate may be breaking apart into the Indian and Australian plates, which are shown separately on this map. February 1996

    Cutaway diagram of Earth’s internal structure (to scale) with inset showing detailed breakdown of structure (not to scale)

    In some parts of Greenland, the lithosphere can be about 124 miles to 186 miles (200 to 300 kilometers) thick. But because of the plume, the lithosphere in East Greenland is often thinner than 62 miles (100 km), making it easy for rising hot rocks in the mantle to cause uplift.

    About 5 million years ago, hot rocks underneath Iceland rose from Earth’s mantle, and flowed northward toward East Greenland. With an already-thin lithosphere, this underground activity easily bolstered Iceland’s mountains, causing them to reach more than 1.9 miles (3 km) above sea level.

    In West Greenland, where the lithosphere is thicker, the mountains reach less than 1.2 miles (2 km) above sea level, the researchers said.

    When the scientists applied the underground activity from Iceland to a computer model, they saw how it acted over time.

    “These hot rocks flow northward beneath the lithosphere, that is, towards eastern Greenland,” the study’s lead researcher, Bernhard Steinberger, of the German Research Centre for Geosciences GFZ, said in a statement. “Because the upwelling beneath Iceland — the Iceland plume — sometimes gets stronger and sometimes weaker, uplift and subsidence can be explained.”

    Moreover, the researchers found clues in the eastern part of the country, where glaciation first began. Dating showed that rock samples from the tops of mountains in East Greenland were uplifted within the past 10 million years, when the hot rocks would have been pushing up the mountains.

    See the full article here.

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

  • richardmitnick 12:28 pm on December 4, 2014 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Glaciers, ,   

    From livescience: “Growing Antarctic Ice Sheets May Have Sparked Ice Age” 


    December 04, 2014
    Charles Q. Choi

    The origins of the last major ice age, which cloaked the Northern Hemisphere in colossal glaciers, might have had a surprising cause: the buildup of ice sheets on the other side of the planet, in Antarctica, researchers say.

    The sun setting over a field of broken sea ice, or frozen seawater that floats on the ocean, in Antarctica. Credit: Rob Johnson

    At the end of the Pliocene epoch about 2.6 million years ago, ice sheets began covering Europe and North America. Since then, such ice sheets have regularly grown and shrunk more than 50 times, causing sea levels to rise and fall by more than 330 feet (100 meters).

    But the exact trigger of the cooling during the Late Pliocene that led these glaciers to form is a mystery. Some researchers have suggested that tectonic events, such as the closure of the Panama Seaway and the uplift of the Rocky Mountains, could have played a role, as they may have caused shifts in circulation patterns in the ocean or atmosphere of the Northern Hemisphere.

    In the new study, the researchers found evidence that Earth’s polar ice sheets began growing between 3.1 million and 2.7 million years ago. However, this time frame means that the glacier growth preceded the growth of major glaciers across North America — the earliest compelling evidence suggests Northern glaciers began growing about 2.7 million years ago.

    This finding suggests that most of the earlier ice growth occurred in the Antarctic.

    Although they’ve been on the retreat since Earth’s last ice age, glaciers still have the power to amaze. These frozen masses of ice cover 10 percent of Earth’s land area, appearing on every continent, even Africa, according to the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC). (Above, glacial ice at Parque Nacional los Glaciares in Argentina.)

    The largest and longest glacier in Europe snakes among mountain peaks like a river frozen in time. Glaciers form when layers of snow build upon one another year after year. Eventually, the lower layers re-crystallize into ice. Tiny air bubbles in the ice preserve bits of ancient atmosphere, making glaciers an important research tool for scientists looking to understand the climate of thousands of years.

    The findings also reveal that “a change in deep-sea heat transport had a profound effect on the Earth’s climate,” said lead study author Stella Woodard, a geochemist and paleooceanographer at Rutgers University in New Jersey. Deep-sea currents are responsible for about 30 to 50 percent of global heat storage and transport.

    Rutgers Seal

    In the study, Woodard and her colleagues analyzed the shells of microscopic bottom-dwelling organisms known as foraminifera in ancient sediments in the Pacific collected by the International Ocean Discovery Program. “I chose a site in the Pacific because it holds about 50 percent of the world’s ocean water,” Woodard told Live Science.

    The concentrations of various forms of magnesium, calcium and oxygen in these foraminifera shells yielded insights on how well these creatures grew, and thus on what ocean temperatures and ice levels were like at specific points in time.

    The scientists also found that, in the Late Pliocene, deep water in the North Atlantic cooled rapidly, by about 4 degrees Fahrenheit (2 degrees Celsius), and deep water in the North Pacific warmed by about 3 F (1.5 C). This meant that the growth of the Antarctic ice sheet coincided with more equal temperatures between the bottom of the Atlantic and Pacific oceans, suggesting heat flow between them.

    The researchers suggested that the growth of the Antarctic ice sheet altered ocean currents worldwide. More Antarctic sea ice would have meant there was less warm, salty water from the North Atlantic that rose upwards and mixed with the surface waters surrounding Antarctica. Instead, this conveyer belt of heat would have redirected into the deep waters of the Pacific Ocean, and these changes in heat flow might have been substantial enough to initiate glacier formation in the Northern Hemisphere.

    “They looked at a different part of the world than is traditionally looked at for the onset of cooling,” said Robert McKay, a paleoclimatologist at Victoria University of Wellington in New Zealand, who did not take part in this research. “These are very novel and interesting results. They still require some explaining, but I think the researchers did quite a good job.”

    The findings do not necessarily exclude other explanations for the Late Pliocene cooling, Woodard noted. However, the fairly rapid change in temperature and circulation that the researchers suggested does imply that a slow process, such as the closure of the Panamanian Seaway, “could have played only an indirect role in the climatic cooling about 2.73 million years ago,” Woodard said.

    The scientists detailed their findings online Oct. 23 in the journal Science.

    See the full article here.

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: