Tagged: Gamma Rays Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • richardmitnick 4:41 pm on June 29, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: From the lab to the ports, Gamma Rays, Inspiration from light-emitting diodes lead to performance boost, , , Scintillating discovery at Sandia Labs, scintillator made of organic glass - much better   

    From Sandia: “Scintillating discovery at Sandia Labs” 

    Sandia Lab

    June 29, 2017

    Bright thinking leads to breakthrough in nuclear threat detection science.

    Sandia National Laboratories researcher Patrick Feng, left, holds a trans-stilbene scintillator and Joey Carlson holds a scintillator made of organic glass. The trans-stilbene is an order of magnitude more expensive and takes longer to produce. (Photo by Randy Wong).

    Taking inspiration from an unusual source, a Sandia National Laboratories team has dramatically improved the science of scintillators — objects that detect nuclear threats. According to the team, using organic glass scintillators could soon make it even harder to smuggle nuclear materials through America’s ports and borders.

    The Sandia Labs team developed a scintillator made of an organic glass which is more effective than the best-known nuclear threat detection material while being much easier and cheaper to produce. Organic glass is a carbon-based material that can be melted and does not become cloudy or crystallize upon cooling. Successful results of the Defense Nuclear Nonproliferation project team’s tests on organic glass scintillators are described in a paper published this week in The Journal of the American Chemical Society.

    Sandia Labs material scientist and principal investigator Patrick Feng started developing alternative classes of organic scintillators in 2010. Feng explained he and his team set out to “strengthen national security by improving the cost-to-performance ratio of radiation detectors at the front lines of all material moving into the country.” To improve that ratio, the team needed to bridge the gap between the best, brightest, most sensitive scintillator material and the lower costs of less sensitive materials.

    Inspiration from light-emitting diodes lead to performance boost

    The team designed, synthesized and assessed new scintillator molecules for this project with the goal of understanding the relationship between the molecular structures and the resulting radiation detection properties. They made progress finding scintillators able to indicate the difference between nuclear materials that could be potential threats and normal, non-threatening sources of radiation, like those used for medical treatments or the radiation naturally present in our atmosphere.

    The team first reported [Science Direct] on the benefits of using organic glass as a scintillator material in June 2016. Organic chemist Joey Carlson said further breakthroughs really became possible when he realized scintillators behave a lot like light-emitting diodes.

    With LEDs, a known source and amount of electrical energy is applied to a device to produce a desired amount of light. In contrast, scintillators produce light in response to the presence of an unknown radiation source material. Depending on the amount of light produced and the speed with which the light appears, the source can be identified.

    Despite these differences in the ways that they operate, both LEDs and scintillators harness electrical energy to produce light. Fluorene is a light-emitting molecule used in some types of LEDs. The team found it was possible to achieve the most desirable qualities — stability, transparency and brightness — by incorporating fluorene into their scintillator compounds.

    Sandia National Laboratories researcher Joey Carlson demonstrates the ease of casting an organic glass scintillator, which takes only a few minutes as compared to growing a trans-stilbene crystal, which can take several months. (Photo by Randy Wong).

    The gold standard scintillator material for the past 40 years has been the crystalline form of a molecule called trans-stilbene, despite intense research to develop a replacement. Trans-stilbene is highly effective at differentiating between two types of radiation: gamma rays, which are ubiquitous in the environment, and neutrons, which emanate almost exclusively from controlled threat materials such as plutonium or uranium. Trans-stilbene is very sensitive to these materials, producing a bright light in response to their presence. But it takes a lot of energy and several months to produce a trans-stilbene crystal only a few inches long. The crystals are incredibly expensive, around $1,000 per cubic inch, and they’re fragile, so they aren’t commonly used in the field.

    Instead, the most commonly used scintillators at borders and ports of entry are plastics. They’re comparatively inexpensive at less than a dollar per cubic inch, and they can be molded into very large shapes, which is essential for scintillator sensitivity. As Feng explained, “The bigger your detector, the more sensitive it’s going to be, because there’s a higher chance that radiation will hit it.”

    Despite these positives, plastics aren’t able to efficiently differentiate between types of radiation — a separate helium tube is required for that. The type of helium used in these tubes is rare, non-renewable and significantly adds to the cost and complexity of a plastic scintillator system. And plastics aren’t particularly bright, at only two-thirds the intensity of trans-stilbene, which means they do not do well detecting weak sources of radiation.

    For these reasons, Sandia Labs’ team began experimenting with organic glasses, which are able to discriminate between types of radiation. In fact, Feng’s team found the glass scintillators surpass even the trans-stilbene in radiation detection tests — they are brighter and better at discriminating between types of radiation.

    Another challenge: The initial glass compounds the team made weren’t stable. If the glasses got too hot for too long, they would crystallize, which affected their performance. Feng’s team found that blending compounds containing fluorene to the organic glass molecules made them indefinitely stable. The stable glasses could then also be melted and cast into large blocks, which is an easier and less expensive process than making plastics or trans-stilbene.

    From the lab to the ports

    The work thus far shows indefinite stability in a laboratory, meaning the material does not degrade over time. Now, the next step toward commercialization is casting a very large prototype organic glass scintillator for field testing. Feng and his team want to show that organic glass scintillators can withstand the humidity and other environmental conditions found at ports.

    The National Nuclear Security Administration has funded the project for an additional two years. This gives the team time to see if they can use organic glass scintillators to meet additional national security needs.

    Going forward, Feng and his team also plan to experiment with the organic glass until it can distinguish between sources of gamma rays that are non-threatening and those that can be used to make dirty bombs.

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    Sandia Campus
    Sandia National Laboratory

    Sandia National Laboratories is a multiprogram laboratory operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration. With main facilities in Albuquerque, N.M., and Livermore, Calif., Sandia has major R&D responsibilities in national security, energy and environmental technologies, and economic competitiveness.

  • richardmitnick 2:37 pm on June 13, 2017 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , , , Gamma Rays, ,   

    From FNAL: Searches for dark matter evidence with galactic gamma-rays 

    FNAL II photo

    FNAL Art Image
    FNAL Art Image by Angela Gonzales

    Fermilab is an enduring source of strength for the US contribution to scientific research world wide.

    June 13, 2017
    Troy Rummler

    Researchers believe that gamma rays — a very energetic form of light — could be produced when hypothetical dark matter particles decay or collide and destroy each other. Fermilab scientist Dan Hooper co-discovered more gamma-rays than he could explain at the center of our own galaxy in 2009 and sparked international interest. Whether dark matter particles or something else is responsible for these gamma rays remains an open and hotly debated question.

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    FNAL Icon
    Fermilab Campus

    Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (Fermilab), located just outside Batavia, Illinois, near Chicago, is a US Department of Energy national laboratory specializing in high-energy particle physics. Fermilab is America’s premier laboratory for particle physics and accelerator research, funded by the U.S. Department of Energy. Thousands of scientists from universities and laboratories around the world
    collaborate at Fermilab on experiments at the frontiers of discovery.

  • richardmitnick 1:24 pm on December 21, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: A Counterpart for Fast Radio Bursts, , , , , Gamma Rays, Neutron Star Merge   

    From astrobites: “A Counterpart for Fast Radio Bursts” 

    Astrobites bloc


    Dec 20, 2016
    Joanna Bridge

    Title: Discovery of a Transient Gamma-Ray Counterpart to FRB 131104
    Authors: J. J. DeLaunay, D. B. Fox, K. Murase, P. Mézáros, A. Keivani, C. Messick, M. A. Mostafa, F. Oikonomou, G. Tešić, and C. F. Turley
    First Author’s Institution: Department of Physics, Pennsylvania State University
    Status: Published in ApJ Letters

    It’s a mysterious case worthy of Sherlock Holmes – seemingly random bursts of radio emission generated from somewhere outside the Milky Way, with no obvious source. These emissions, known as Fast Radio Bursts (FRB), have plagued astronomers over the last several years.

    FRB Fast Radio Bursts from NAOJ Subaru, Mauna Key, Hawaii, USA
    FRB Fast Radio Bursts from NAOJ Subaru, Mauna Key, Hawaii, USA

    They were initially discovered in data archives of the Parkes radio telescope in Australia, popping up as relatively strong radio bursts that lasted only 5 milliseconds.

    CSIRO/Parkes Observatory, located 20 kilometres north of the town of Parkes, New South Wales, Australia
    CSIRO/Parkes Observatory, located 20 kilometres north of the town of Parkes, New South Wales, Australia

    The usual radio bursts we detect are usually repeating, emanating from rapidly spinning neutron stars known as pulsars. This radio signal was all alone.

    Even stranger, the signal was dispersed, which means the higher frequency portion of the burst was detected before the lower frequencies. Dispersion is a result of the lower frequency signal being slowed preferentially compared to the high frequencies by the electron clouds between us and the source. Measuring the delay between low and high frequency gives us the distance the signal has traveled. This dispersion indicated that the burst must have originated from very far away – by at least 1 Gigaparsec. That’s a distance of over 3 billion light years!

    Since the archival discovery of FRBs, these sneaky radio bursts have been caught in the act by Parkes telescope, as well as Arecibo in Puerto Rico and the Green Bank Telescope in West Virginia.

    NAIC/Arecibo Observatory, Puerto Rico, USA
    NAIC/Arecibo Observatory, Puerto Rico, USA

    GBO radio telescope, Green Bank, West Virginia, USA
    GBO radio telescope, Green Bank, West Virginia, USA

    But until now, there have been no detections in any other wavelengths than radio. In today’s paper, we see for the first time a possible counterpart for an FRB detected in very high energy gamma rays using the Swift telescope.

    NASA/SWIFT Telescope
    NASA/SWIFT Telescope

    Swift has onboard the Burst Alert Telescope (BAT) that is usually triggered when a gamma ray burst goes off somewhere in the universe. If a typical gamma ray burst was responsible for FRBs, then the BAT would have been triggered, providing almost instantaneous gamma ray measurements in the same general direction of the the FRB. The authors of today’s paper, however, wondered if perhaps there is a gamma ray counterpart to the FRBs, but is not luminous enough to trigger the BAT on Swift. They therefore went digging in the archival BAT data, looking for times when Swift just fortuitously happened to be looking in the same direction as an FRB when the radio signal was detected.

    Figure 1 The Swift BAT detection of FRB 131104. (a) shows the portion of the field of view of the BAT where the gamma ray counterpart was detected, denoted by the black circle near the top of the image. The x- and y-axes denote the position on the sky in right ascension (RA) and declination (dec), and the color bar shows how well-detected the emission is, in units of signal above the noise. (b) gives the number of photons detected per second as a function of time for gamma rays in the 5-15 keV energy range.

    Sure enough, there were four times when an FRB was detected within the same field of view as the BAT on Swift. Of these four possibilities, a gamma ray counterpart was detected for the FRB 131104 (so named for two digits for the year, month, and date of observation.) This detection is shown in Figure 1. This FRB is located 3.2 Gigaparsecs away, which corresponds to a redshift of z ~ 0.55. The reason that the BAT was not triggered for this gamma ray burst was because it was on the very edge of the detector, illuminating only 2.9% of the telescope’s detector. The authors were very careful to rule out other causes for the gamma rays.

    Of course, there are still unanswered questions about this detection. One mystery is that while the FRB lasted only 5 milliseconds, the emission detected in gamma rays lasted several minutes and released significantly more energy — a billion times more — than was detected in the radio burst. One theory posits that the sources of FRBs are brightly flaring magnetars, which are neutron stars with extremely high magnetic fields.

    Artist’s impression of the magnetar in star cluster Westerlund 1. Credit: ESO/L. Calçada

    However, if magnetars are the culprit, then the gamma ray emission should not be nearly that long nor that energetic. On the other hand, FRBs with gamma ray counterparts could be caused by binary neutron stars spiraling into each other.

    Neutron Star Merge. NASA Goddard Media Studios

    However, models indicate that we should see only about 25 of these events a year, whereas the inferred rate of FRBs is thought to be on the order of thousands per day.

    Suffice it to say, I think this is a mystery that would stump even the great detective Holmes himself (minus the small detail that he wasn’t an astrophysicist.) In some ways, this new gamma ray counterpart discovery is extremely enlightening, giving clues as to where to look next for the source of FRBs. On the other hand, however, this detection has resulted in even more questions about FRB origins. As is often the case in science, more data are needed! In the future, we should be able to fine tune the threshold for triggering the BAT when the next fast radio burst goes off, allowing us to catch it the FRB and its gamma rays in the act.

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    What do we do?

    Astrobites is a daily astrophysical literature journal written by graduate students in astronomy. Our goal is to present one interesting paper per day in a brief format that is accessible to undergraduate students in the physical sciences who are interested in active research.
    Why read Astrobites?

    Reading a technical paper from an unfamiliar subfield is intimidating. It may not be obvious how the techniques used by the researchers really work or what role the new research plays in answering the bigger questions motivating that field, not to mention the obscure jargon! For most people, it takes years for scientific papers to become meaningful.
    Our goal is to solve this problem, one paper at a time. In 5 minutes a day reading Astrobites, you should not only learn about one interesting piece of current work, but also get a peek at the broader picture of research in a new area of astronomy.

  • richardmitnick 7:07 am on November 5, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Gamma Rays, MAGIC at LAPALMA, QSO B0218+357 is a blazar   

    From MAGIC: “Detour via gravitational lens makes distant galaxy visible” 

    MAGIC Cherenkov gamma ray telescope  on the Canary island of La Palma, Spain
    MAGIC Cherenkov gamma ray telescope on the Canary island of La Palma, Spain


    November 4, 2016
    No writer credit found.

    The MAGIC telescopes on the canary island of La Palma are shown. Credit: Robert Wagner

    Never before have astrophysicists measured light of such high energy from a celestial object so far away. Around 7 billion years ago, a huge explosion occurred at the black hole in the center of a galaxy. This was followed by a burst of high-intensity gamma rays. A number of telescopes, MAGIC included, have succeeded in capturing this light. An added bonus: it was thus possible to reconfirm Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity, as the light rays encountered a less distant galaxy en route to Earth – and were deflected by this so-called gravitational lens.

    The object QSO B0218+357 is a blazar, a specific type of black hole. Researchers now assume that there is a supermassive black hole at the center of every galaxy. Black holes, into which matter is currently plunging are called active black holes. They emit extremely bright jets. If these bursts point towards Earth, the term blazar is used.

    Full moon prevents the first MAGIC observation

    The event now described in “Astronomy & Astrophysics” took place 7 billion years ago, when the universe was not even half its present age. “The blazar was discovered initially on 14 July 2014 by the Large Area Telescope (LAT) of the Fermi satellite,” explains Razmik Mirzoyan, scientist at the Max Planck Institute for Physics and spokesperson for the MAGIC collaboration. “The gamma ray telescopes on Earth immediately fixed their sights on the blazer in order to learn more about this object.”

    One of these telescopes was MAGIC, on the Canary Island of La Palma, specialized in high-energy gamma rays. It can capture photons – light particles – whose energy is 100 billion times higher than the photons emitted by our Sun and a thousand times higher than those measured by Fermi-LAT. The MAGIC scientists were initially out of luck, however: A full moon meant the telescope was not able to operate during the time in question.

    Photons are emitted from a galaxy QSO B0218+357 in the direction of the Earth. Due to the gravitational effect of the intervening galaxy B0218+357G photons form two paths that reach Earth with a delay of about 11 days. Photons were observed by both the Fermi-LAT instrument and the MAGIC telescopes. Credit: Daniel Lopez/IAC; NASA/ESA; NASA E/PO – Sonoma State University, Aurore Simonnet

    Gravitational lens deflects ultra-high-energy photons

    Eleven days later, MAGIC got a second chance, as the gamma rays emitted by QSO B0218+357 did not take the direct route to Earth: One billion years after setting off on their journey, they reached the galaxy B0218+357G. This is where Einstein’s General Theory of Relativity came into play.

    This states that a large mass in the universe, a galaxy, for example, deflects light of an object behind it. In addition, the light is focused as if by a gigantic optical lens – to a distant observer, the object appears to be much brighter, but also distorted. The light beams also need different lengths of time to pass through the lens, depending on the angle of observation.

    This gravitational lens was the reason that MAGIC was able, after all, to measure QSO B0218+357 – and thus the most distant object in the high-energy gamma ray spectrum. “We knew from observations undertaken by the Fermi space telescope and radio telescopes in 2012 that the photons that took the longer route would arrive 11 days later,” says Julian Sitarek (University of ?ódz, Poland), who led this study. “This was the first time we were able to observe that high-energy photons were deflected by a gravitational lens.”

    Doubling the size of the gamma-ray universe

    The fact that gamma rays of such high energy from a distant celestial body reach Earth’s atmosphere is anything but obvious. “Many gamma rays are lost when they interact with photons which originate from galaxies or stars and have a lower energy,” says Mirzoyan. “With the MAGIC observation, the part of the universe that we can observe via gamma rays has doubled.”

    The fact that the light arrived on Earth at the time calculated could rattle a few theories on the structure of the vacuum – further investigations, however, are required to confirm this. “The observation currently points to new possibilities for high-energy gamma ray observatories – and provides a pointer for the next generation of telescopes in the CTA project,” says Mirzoyan, summing up the situation.

    See the full article here .


    MAGIC (Major Atmospheric Gamma Imaging Cherenkov) is a system of two 17 m diameter, F/1.03 Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes (IACT). They are dedicated to the observation of gamma rays from galactic and extragalactic sources in the very high energy range (VHE, 30 GeV to 100 TeV).

    The MAGIC telescopes are currently run by an international collaboration of about 165 astrophysicists from 24 institutions and consortia from 11 countries.

    MAGIC in a Nutshell

    The main goal of the MAGIC project was to build an instrument that could perform measurements in an energy range below 100 GeV, down to about 30 GeV, up to the high-energetic “terra incognita” of the electromagnetic emission spectrum, traditionally considered as the classical domain of satellite-born instruments. MAGIC researchers were anticipating finding new classes of gamma-ray sources such as, for example, pulsars and Gamma Ray Bursts (GRB). Because of the strong absorption of TeV gamma rays by the extragalactic background light, MAGIC was aiming to measure sources at few tens of GeV, where the universe becomes progressively more transparent. At lower energies, one can search for powerful sources residing at large redshifts. The telescopes measure Cherenkov light images of extended air showers from a target source direction. The software analysis allows, with very high efficiency, to select neutral gamma-ray induced electromagnetic showers from the several orders of magnitudes more intense isotropic background due to the charged particle (mostly hadron) induced showers. The MAGIC telescopes are located at a height of 2200 m a.s.l. on the Roque de los Muchachos European Northern Observatory on the Canary Island of La Palma (28°N, 18°W).

  • richardmitnick 8:59 pm on July 5, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , Gamma Rays, ,   

    From Symmetry: “Incredible hulking facts about gamma rays” 


    Matthew R. Francis


    From lightning to the death of electrons, the highest-energy form of light is everywhere.

    Gamma rays are the most energetic type of light, packing a punch strong enough to pierce through metal or concrete barriers. More energetic than X-rays, they are born in the chaos of exploding stars, the annihilation of electrons and the decay of radioactive atoms. And today, medical scientists have a fine enough control of them to use them for surgery. Here are seven amazing facts about these powerful photons.

    Doctors conduct brain surgery using “gamma ray knives.”


    Gamma rays can be helpful as well as harmful (and are very unlikely to turn you into the Hulk). To destroy brain cancers and other problems, medical scientists sometimes use a “gamma ray knife.” This consists of many beams of gamma rays focused on the cells that need to be destroyed. Because each beam is relatively small, it does little damage to healthy brain tissue. But where they are focused, the amount of radiation is intense enough to kill the cancer cells. Since brains are delicate, the gamma ray knife is a relatively safe way to do certain kinds of surgery that would be a challenge with ordinary scalpels.

    [My wife had gamma-knife brain surgery. Whn I asked her neursurgeon how they got gamma rays, he replied from cobalt.]


    The name “gamma rays” came from Ernest Rutherford.

    French chemist Paul Villard first identified gamma rays in 1900 from the element radium, which had been isolated by Marie and Pierre Curie just two years before. When scientists first studied how atomic nuclei changed form, they identified three types of radiation based on how far they penetrated into a barrier made of lead. Ernest Rutherford named the radiation for the first three letters of the Greek alphabet. Alpha rays bounce right off, beta rays went a little farther, and gamma rays went the farthest. Today we know alpha rays are the same thing as helium nuclei (two protons and two neutrons), beta rays are either electrons or positrons (their antimatter versions), and gamma rays are a kind of light.


    Nuclear reactions are a major source of gamma rays.

    When an unstable uranium nucleus splits in the process of nuclear fission, it releases a lot of gamma rays in the process. Fission is used in both nuclear reactors and nuclear warheads. To monitor nuclear tests in the 1960s, the United States launched gamma radiation detectors on satellites. They found far more explosions than they expected to see. Astronomers eventually realized these explosions were coming from deep space—not the Soviet Union—and named them gamma-ray bursts, or GRBs. Today we know GRBs come in two types: the explosions of extremely massive stars, which pump out gamma rays as they die, and collisions between highly dense relics of stars called neutron stars and something else, probably another neutron star or a black hole.


    Gamma rays played a key role in the discovery of the Higgs boson.

    Most of the particles in the Standard Model of particle physics are unstable; they decay into other particles almost as soon as they come into existence. The Higgs boson, for example, can decay into many different types of particles, including gamma rays. Even though theory predicts that a Higgs boson will decay into gamma rays just 0.2 percent of the time, this type of decay is relatively easy to identify and it was one of the types that scientists observed when they first discovered the Higgs boson.

    NASA Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope  Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM)
    NASA Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Gamma-ray Burst Monitor

    To study gamma rays, astronomers build telescopes in space.

    Gamma rays heading toward the Earth from space interact with enough atoms in the atmosphere that almost none of them reach the surface of the planet. That’s good for our health, but not so great for those who want to study GRBs and other sources of gamma rays. To see gamma rays before they reach the atmosphere, astronomers have to build telescopes in space. This is challenging for a number of reasons. For example, you can’t use a normal lens or mirror to focus gamma rays, because the rays punch right through them. Instead an observatory like the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope detects the signal from gamma rays when they hit a detector and convert into pairs of electrons and positrons.

    Some gamma rays come from thunderstorms.

    In the 1990s, observatories in space detected bursts of gamma rays coming from Earth that eventually were traced to thunderclouds. When static electricity builds up inside clouds, the immediate result is lightning. That static electricity also acts like a giant particle accelerator, creating pairs of electrons and positrons, which then annihilate into gamma rays. These bursts happen high enough in the air that only airplanes are exposed—and they’re one reason for flights to steer well away from storms.

    Gamma rays (indirectly) give life to Earth.

    Hydrogen nuclei are always fusing together in the core of the sun. When this happens, one byproduct is gamma rays. The energy of the gamma rays keeps the sun’s core hot. Some of those gamma rays also escape into the sun’s outer layers, where they collide with electrons and protons and lose energy. As they lose energy, they change into ultraviolet, infrared and visible light. The infrared light keeps Earth warm, and the visible light sustains Earth’s plants.

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    Symmetry is a joint Fermilab/SLAC publication.

  • richardmitnick 11:36 am on June 4, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Gamma Rays   

    From Astro Watch: “At the Cradle of Oxygen: Brand-new Detector to Reveal the Interiors of Stars” 

    Astro Watch bloc

    Astro Watch

    June 4, 2016
    No writer credit found

    No image caption. No image credit

    The most intense source of gamma radiation constructed to date will soon become operational at the ELI Nuclear Physics research facility. It will be possible to study reactions that reveal the details of many processes occurring within stars, in particular those leading to the formation of oxygen. An important part of the equipment will rely on a particle detector built by physicists at the University of Warsaw, Poland. A prototype has recently concluded the first round of testing.

    Oxygen is essential for life: we are immersed in it yet none of it actually originates from our own planet. All oxygen was ultimately formed through thermonuclear reactions deep inside stars. Laboratory studies of the astrophysical processes leading to the formation of oxygen are extremely important. A big step forward in these studies will be possible when work commences in 2018 at the Extreme Light Infrastructure – Nuclear Physics (ELI-NP) facility near Bucharest, using a state-of-the-art source of intense gamma radiation. High energy protons will be intercepted using a specially-designed particle detector acting as a target. A demonstrator version of the detector, constructed at the Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw (FUW), has recently completed the first round of tests in Romania.

    In terms of mass, the most abundant elements in the Universe are hydrogen (74%) and helium (24%). The percentage by mass of other, heavier elements is significantly lower: oxygen comprises just 0.85% and carbon 0.39% (in contrast, oxygen comprises 65% of the human body and carbon 18% by mass). In nature, conditions supporting the formation of oxygen are present only within evolutionarily-advanced stars which have converted almost all their hydrogen into helium. Helium becomes then their main fuel. At this stage, three helium nuclei start combining into a carbon nucleus. By adding another helium nucleus, this in turn forms an oxygen nucleus and emits one or more gamma photons.

    “Oxygen can be described as the ‘ash’ from the thermonuclear ‘combustion’ of carbon. But what mechanism explains why carbon and oxygen are always formed in stars at more or less the same proportion of 6 to 10?” asks Dr. Chiara Mazzocchi (FUW). She goes on to explain: “Stars evolve in stages. During the first stage, they convert hydrogen into helium, then helium into carbon, oxygen and nitrogen, with heavier elements formed in subsequent stages. Oxygen is formed from carbon during the helium-burning phase. The thing is that, in theory, oxygen could be produced at a faster rate. If the star were to run out of helium and shift to the next stage of its evolution, the proportions between carbon and oxygen would be different.”

    The experiments planned for ELI-NP will not actually recreate thermonuclear reactions converting carbon into oxygen and photons gamma. In fact, researchers are hoping to observe the reverse reaction: collisions between high-energy photons with oxygen nuclei to produce carbon and helium nuclei. Registering the products of this decay should make it possible to study the characteristics of the reaction and fine-tune existing theoretical models of thermonuclear synthesis.

    “We are preparing an eTPC detector for the experiments at ELI-NP. It is an electronic-readout time-projection chamber, which is an updated version of an earlier detector built at the Faculty’s Institute of Experimental Physics. The latter was successfully used by our researchers for the world’s first observations of a rare nuclear process: two-proton decay,” says Dr. Mikolaj Cwiok (FUW).

    The main element of the eTPC detector is a chamber filled with gas comprising many oxygen nuclei (e.g. carbon dioxide). The gas acts as a target. The gamma radiation beam passes through the gas, with some of the photons colliding with oxygen nuclei to produce carbon and helium nuclei. The nuclei formed through the reaction, which are charged particles, ionize the gas. In order to increase their range, the gas is kept at a reduced pressure, around 1/10 of the atmospheric one. The released electrons are directed using an electric field towards the Gas Electron Multiplier (GEM) amplification structures followed by readout electrodes. The paths of the particles are registered electronically using strip electrodes. Processing the data using specialized FPGA processors makes it possible to reconstruct the 3D paths of the particles.

    The active region of the detector will be 35x20x20 cm3, and at nominal intensity of the photon beam it should register up to 70 collisions of gamma photons with oxygen nuclei per day. Tests at ELI-NP used a demonstrator:a smaller but fully functional version of the final detector, named mini-eTPC. The device was tested with a beam of alpha particles (helium nuclei).

    “We are extremely pleased with the results of the tests conducted thus far. The demonstrator worked as we expected and successfully registered the tracks of charged particles. We are certain to use it in future research as a fully operational measuring device. In 2018, ELI-NP will be equipped with a larger detector which we are currently building at our laboratories,” adds Dr. Mazzocchi.

    The project is carried out in collaboration with researchers from ELI-NP/IFIN-HH (Magurele, Romania) and the University of Connecticut in the US. The Warsaw team, led by Prof. Wojciech Dominik, brings together physicists and engineers from the Division of Particles and Fundamental Interactions and the Nuclear Physics Division and students from the University of Warsaw: Jan Stefan Bihalowicz, Jerzy Manczak, Katarzyna Mikszuta and Piotr Podlaski.

    Extreme Light Infrastructure (ELI) is a research project valued at 850 million euro, conducted as part of the European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures roadmap. The ELI scientific consortium will encompass three centers in the Czech Republic, Romania and Hungary, focusing on research into the interactions between light and matter under the conditions of the most powerful photon beams and at a wide range of wavelengths and timescales measured in attoseconds (a billionth of a billionth of a second). The Romanian ELI – Nuclear Physics center, in Magurele near Bucharest, conducts research into two sources of radiation: high-intensity radiation lasers (of the order of a 1023 watts per square centimeter), and high-intensity sources of monochromatic gamma radiation. The gamma beam will be formed by scattering laser light off the electrons accelerated by a linear accelerator to speeds nearing the speed of light.

    Credit: fuw.edu.pl
    Dr. Chiara Mazzocchi
    Institute of Experimental Physics, Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw
    tel. +48 22 5532666
    email: chiara.mazzocchi@fuw.edu.pl

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

  • richardmitnick 11:40 am on May 9, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Gamma Rays,   

    From New Scientist: “Water telescope’s first sky map shows flickering black holes” 


    New Scientist

    18 April 2016 [just appeared on social media]

    Lisa Grossman

    HAWC High Altitude Cherenkov Experiment, HAWC Collaboration
    HAWC High Altitude Cherenkov Gamma-Ray Collaboration, HAWC Observatory, Sierra Negra volcano near Puebla, Mexico

    Twinkle, twinkle, little black hole. The High Altitude Water Cherenkov observatory has released its first map of the sky, including the first measurements of how often black holes flicker on and off. It has also caught pulsars, supernova remnants, and other bizarre cosmic beasts.

    “This is our deepest look at two-thirds of the sky, as well as the highest energy photons we’ve ever seen from any source,” says Brenda Dingus of Los Alamos National Laboratory, who presented the map at the American Physical Society meeting in Salt Lake City, Utah on 18 April. “We’re at the high energy frontier.”

    HAWC has been operating from the top of a mountain in central Mexico for about a year, and has caught some of the highest-energy photons ever observed. It is sensitive to gamma rays between 0.1 and 100 teraelectronvolts (TeV) in energy – more than 7 times higher energy than the particles produced in the Large Hadron Collider. The most energetic photon they’ve picked up so far is 60 TeV.

    HAWC’s map of the gamma ray sky. HAWC Collaboration

    But this is no normal telescope. “HAWC doesn’t look or work like any other observatory,” Dingus says. The detector is made up of 300 water tanks filled with 200,000 litres of purified water each (see main image, above). When high-energy particles go through the water, they emit a blue light called Cherenkov radiation. Physicists can use that light to reconstruct where the particles came from.

    HAWC doesn’t observe the extremely high-energy photons directly. They are blocked by our atmosphere – luckily for us, as they can damage living tissue. Instead the detector catches the spray of secondary particles that gamma rays produce when they strike the atmosphere, called air showers.

    “20,000 air shower particles per second hit our detector,” Dingus says. “In fact they’re hitting us right now.”

    In the first year of data, HAWC picked up 40 distinct sources of gamma rays, 10 of which had not been seen in gamma rays before. The team is now working to figure out if they were associated with any other known objects that have been seen in other wavelengths like visible or infrared light.

    One, for instance, was associated with a known supernova remnant from an energetic pulsar, says Michelle Hui of NASA’s Marshall Spaceflight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. When massive stars die as supernovas, they slough off material in a cloud called a supernova remnant. The shock wave from the explosion then sweeps through the cloud and accelerates particles in it to extremely high energies, where they radiate gamma rays.

    Another source is a known pulsar 26,000 light years away. A nearby third is still being identified, and might be related to the supernova remnant.

    Three new sources of gamma rays spotted by HAWC. HAWC Collaboration

    Flickering black holes

    HAWC can also pick up gamma rays from galaxies outside the Milky Way, the sources of which are much more mysterious. We think they are caused by the black holes at galactic centres, but the details of how the photons gain so much energy are murky.

    Because it is watching 24 hours a day, the detector can pick up changes in gamma ray brightness more reliably than ever before. Just 10 days ago, HAWC spotted a flare in a galaxy called Markarian 501.

    “On April 5 we didn’t see it, on April 6 it got very bright, and by April 8 it had nearly disappeared again,” said Robert Lauer of the University of New Mexico. The team put out an announcement on the Astronomer’s Telegram network to alert other observatories to follow up in different wavelengths, although it has not had any responses yet.

    Previous telescopes that could catch such energetic photons could only look at one part of the sky at once, so they couldn’t measure the frequency of these flares. Over the next five years, HAWC will be able to make the first measurements of how often they happen. This level of flaring seems to happen about 5 to 10 times per year, Lauer says, but it seems to vary from galaxy to galaxy.

    HAWC will also be able to see such a flare from the black hole at the centre of our own galaxy.

    “We know these things happen, so we expect them to happen here,” Hui says. “We just don’t know how often.”

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

  • richardmitnick 7:27 pm on April 18, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Gamma Rays,   

    From phys.org: “HAWC Gamma-ray Observatory reveals new look at the very-high-energy sky” 


    April 18, 2016

    View of two-thirds of the entire sky with very-high-energy gamma rays observed by HAWC. Many sources are clearly visible in our own Milky Way galaxy, as well as two other galaxies: Markarian 421 and Markarian 501. Some well-known constellations are shown as a reference. The center of the Milky Way is located toward Sagittarius. Credit: HAWC Collaboration

    The United States and Mexico constructed the High Altitude Water Cherenkov (HAWC) Gamma-ray Observatory to observe some of the most energetic phenomena in the known universe—the aftermath when massive stars die, glowing clouds of electrons around rapidly spinning neutron stars, and supermassive black holes devouring matter and spitting out powerful jets of particles. These violent explosions produce high-energy gamma rays and cosmic rays, which can travel large distances—making it possible to see objects and events far outside our own galaxy.

    HAWC High Altitude Cherenkov Experiment
    HAWC High Altitude Cherenkov Experiment

    Today, scientists operating HAWC released a new survey of the sky made from the highest energy gamma rays ever observed. The new sky map, which uses data collected since the observatory began running at full capacity last March, offers a deeper understanding of high-energy processes taking place in our galaxy and beyond.

    “HAWC gives us a new way to see the high-energy sky,” said Jordan Goodman, professor of physics at the University of Maryland, and U.S. lead investigator and spokesperson for the HAWC collaboration. “This new data from HAWC shows the galaxy in unprecedented detail, revealing new high-energy sources and previously unseen details about existing sources.”

    HAWC researchers presented the new observation data and sky map April 18, 2016, at the American Physical Society meeting. They also participated in a press conference at the meeting.

    The new sky map shows many new gamma ray sources within our own Milky Way galaxy. Because HAWC observes 24 hours per day and year-round with a wide field-of-view and large area, the observatory boasts a higher energy reach especially for extended objects. In addition, HAWC can uniquely monitor for gamma ray flares by sources in our galaxy and other active galaxies, such as Markarian 421 and Markarian 501.

    HAWC observations show that a previously known gamma ray source in the Milky Way galaxy, TeV J1930+188, which is probably due to a pulsar wind nebula, is far more complicated than originally thought. Where researchers previously identified a single gamma ray source, HAWC identified several hot spots. Credit: HAWC Collaboration

    One of HAWC’s new observations provides a better understanding of the high-energy nature of the Cygnus region—a northern constellation lying on the plane of the Milky Way. A multitude of neutron stars and supernova remnants call this star nursery home. HAWC scientists observed previously unknown objects in the Cygnus region and identified objects discovered earlier with sharper resolution.

    In a region of the Milky Way where researchers previously identified a single gamma ray source named TeV J1930+188, HAWC identified several hot spots, indicating that the region is more complicated than previously thought.

    “Studying these objects at the highest energies can reveal the mechanism by which they produce gamma rays and possibly help us unravel the hundred-year-old mystery of the origin of high-energy cosmic rays that bombard Earth from space,” said Goodman.

    HAWC—located 13,500 feet above sea level on the slopes of Mexico’s Volcán Sierra Negra—contains 300 detector tanks, each holding 50,000 gallons of ultrapure water with four light sensors anchored to the floor. When gamma rays or cosmic rays reach Earth’s atmosphere they set off a cascade of charged particles, and when these particles reach the water in HAWC’s detectors, they produce a cone-shaped flash of light known as Cherenkov radiation. The effect is much like a sonic boom produced by a supersonic jet, because the particles are traveling slightly faster than the speed of light in water when they enter the detectors.

    The light sensors record each flash of Cherenkov radiation inside the detector tanks. By comparing nanosecond differences in arrival times at each light sensor, scientists can reconstruct the angle of travel for each particle cascade. The intensity of the light indicates the primary particle’s energy, and the pattern of detector hits can distinguish between gamma rays and cosmic rays. With 300 detectors spread over an area equivalent to more than three football fields, HAWC “sees” these events in relatively high resolution.

    “Unlike traditional telescopes, with HAWC we have now an instrument that surveys two-thirds of the sky at the highest energies, day and night,” said Andrés Sandoval, Mexico spokesperson for HAWC.

    HAWC exhibits 15-times greater sensitivity than its predecessor—an observatory known as Milagro that operated near Los Alamos, New Mexico, and ceased taking data in 2008. In eight years of operation, Milagro found new sources of high-energy gamma rays, detected diffuse gamma rays from the Milky Way galaxy and discovered that the cosmic rays hitting earth had an unexpected non-uniformity.

    “HAWC will collect more data in the next few years, allowing us to reach even higher energies,” said Goodman. “Combining HAWC observations with data from other instruments will allow us to extend the reach of our understanding of the most violent processes in the universe.”

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    About Phys.org in 100 Words

    Phys.org™ (formerly Physorg.com) is a leading web-based science, research and technology news service which covers a full range of topics. These include physics, earth science, medicine, nanotechnology, electronics, space, biology, chemistry, computer sciences, engineering, mathematics and other sciences and technologies. Launched in 2004, Phys.org’s readership has grown steadily to include 1.75 million scientists, researchers, and engineers every month. Phys.org publishes approximately 100 quality articles every day, offering some of the most comprehensive coverage of sci-tech developments world-wide. Quancast 2009 includes Phys.org in its list of the Global Top 2,000 Websites. Phys.org community members enjoy access to many personalized features such as social networking, a personal home page set-up, RSS/XML feeds, article comments and ranking, the ability to save favorite articles, a daily newsletter, and other options.

  • richardmitnick 6:29 pm on April 18, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , Gamma Rays, ,   

    From NASA Fermi: “NASA’s Fermi Telescope Poised to Pin Down Gravitational Wave Sources” 

    NASA Fermi Banner

    NASA/Fermi Telescope
    NASA Fermi

    April 18, 2016
    Francis Reddy
    NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Maryland

    On Sept. 14, waves of energy traveling for more than a billion years gently rattled space-time in the vicinity of Earth. The disturbance, produced by a pair of merging black holes, was captured by the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) facilities in Hanford, Washington, and Livingston, Louisiana.

    Black holes merging Swinburne Astronomy Productions
    Black holes merging Swinburne Astronomy Productions

    Cornell SXS team. Two merging black holes simulation
    Cornell SXS team. Two merging black holes simulation

    MIT/Caltech Advanced aLIGO Hanford Washington USA installation
    MIT/Caltech Advanced aLIGO Hanford Washington USA installation

    This event marked the first-ever detection of gravitational waves and opens a new scientific window on how the universe works.

    Less than half a second later, the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM) on NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope picked up a brief, weak burst of high-energy light consistent with the same part of the sky. Analysis of this burst suggests just a 0.2-percent chance of simply being random coincidence. Gamma-rays arising from a black hole merger would be a landmark finding because black holes are expected to merge “cleanly,” without producing any sort of light.

    Access mp4 video here . This visualization shows gravitational waves emitted by two black holes (black spheres) of nearly equal mass as they spiral together and merge. Yellow structures near the black holes illustrate the strong curvature of space-time in the region. Orange ripples represent distortions of space-time caused by the rapidly orbiting masses. These distortions spread out and weaken, ultimately becoming gravitational waves (purple). The merger timescale depends on the masses of the black holes. For a system containing black holes with about 30 times the sun’s mass, similar to the one detected by LIGO in 2015, the orbital period at the start of the movie is just 65 milliseconds, with the black holes moving at about 15 percent the speed of light. Space-time distortions radiate away orbital energy and cause the binary to contract quickly. As the two black holes near each other, they merge into a single black hole that settles into its “ringdown” phase, where the final gravitational waves are emitted. For the 2015 LIGO detection, these events played out in little more than a quarter of a second. This simulation was performed on the Pleiades supercomputer at NASA’s Ames Research Center. Credits: NASA/J. Bernard Kelly (Goddard), Chris Henze (Ames) and Tim Sandstrom (CSC Government Solutions LLC)

    “This is a tantalizing discovery with a low chance of being a false alarm, but before we can start rewriting the textbooks we’ll need to see more bursts associated with gravitational waves from black hole mergers,” said Valerie Connaughton, a GBM team member at the National Space, Science and Technology Center in Huntsville, Alabama, and lead author of a paper on the burst now under review by The Astrophysical Journal.

    Detecting light from a gravitational wave source will enable a much deeper understanding of the event. Fermi’s GBM sees the entire sky not blocked by Earth and is sensitive to X-rays and gamma rays with energies between 8,000 and 40 million electron volts (eV). For comparison, the energy of visible light ranges between about 2 and 3 eV.

    NASA Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope  Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM)
    NASA Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM)

    With its wide energy range and large field of view, the GBM is the premier instrument for detecting light from short gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), which last less than two seconds. They are widely thought to occur when orbiting compact objects, like neutron stars and black holes, spiral inward and crash together. These same systems also are suspected to be prime producers of gravitational waves.

    “With just one joint event, gamma rays and gravitational waves together will tell us exactly what causes a short GRB,” said Lindy Blackburn, a postdoctoral fellow at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and a member of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration. “There is an incredible synergy between the two observations, with gamma rays revealing details about the source’s energetics and local environment and gravitational waves providing a unique probe of the dynamics leading up to the event.” He will be discussing the burst and how Fermi and LIGO are working together in an invited talk at the American Physical Society meeting in Salt Lake City on Tuesday.

    Currently, gravitational wave observatories possess relatively blurry vision. This will improve in time as more facilities begin operation, but for the September event, dubbed GW150914 after the date, LIGO scientists could only trace the source to an arc of sky spanning an area of about 600 square degrees, comparable to the angular area on Earth occupied by the United States.

    “That’s a pretty big haystack to search when your needle is a short GRB, which can be fast and faint, but that’s what our instrument is designed to do,” said Eric Burns, a GBM team member at the University of Alabama in Huntsville. “A GBM detection allows us to whittle down the LIGO area and substantially shrinks the haystack.”

    Access mp4 video here. Fermi’s GBM saw a fading X-ray flash at nearly the same moment LIGO detected gravitational waves from a black hole merger in 2015. This movie shows how scientists can narrow down the location of the LIGO source on the assumption that the burst is connected to it. In this case, the LIGO search area is reduced by two-thirds. Greater improvements are possible in future detections. Credits: NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center

    Less than half a second after LIGO detected gravitational waves, the GBM picked up a faint pulse of high-energy X-rays lasting only about a second. The burst effectively occurred beneath Fermi and at a high angle to the GBM detectors, a situation that limited their ability to establish a precise position. Fortunately, Earth blocked a large swath of the burst’s likely location as seen by Fermi at the time, allowing scientists to further narrow down the burst’s position.

    The GBM team calculates less than a 0.2-percent chance random fluctuations would have occurred in such close proximity to the merger. Assuming the events are connected, the GBM localization and Fermi’s view of Earth combine to reduce the LIGO search area by about two-thirds, to 200 square degrees. With a burst better placed for the GBM’s detectors, or one bright enough to be seen by Fermi’s Large Area Telescope, even greater improvements are possible.

    The LIGO event was produced by the merger of two relatively large black holes, each about 30 times the mass of the sun. Binary systems with black holes this big were not expected to be common, and many questions remain about the nature and origin of the system.

    Black hole mergers were not expected to emit significant X-ray or gamma-ray signals because orbiting gas is needed to generate light. Theorists expected any gas around binary black holes would have been swept up long before their final plunge. For this reason, some astronomers view the GBM burst as most likely a coincidence and unrelated to GW150914. Others have developed alternative scenarios where merging black holes could create observable gamma-ray emission. It will take further detections to clarify what really happens when black holes collide.

    Albert Einstein predicted the existence of gravitational waves in his general theory of relativity a century ago, and scientists have been attempting to detect them for 50 years. Einstein pictured these waves as ripples in the fabric of space-time produced by massive, accelerating bodies, such as black holes orbiting each other. Scientists are interested in observing and characterizing these waves to learn more about the sources producing them and about gravity itself.

    For more information about NASA’s Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, please visit:


    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

    The Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope , formerly referred to as the Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope (GLAST), is a space observatory being used to perform gamma-ray astronomy observations from low Earth orbit. Its main instrument is the Large Area Telescope (LAT), with which astronomers mostly intend to perform an all-sky survey studying astrophysical and cosmological phenomena such as active galactic nuclei, pulsars, other high-energy sources and dark matter. Another instrument aboard Fermi, the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor (GBM; formerly GLAST Burst Monitor), is being used to study gamma-ray bursts. The mission is a joint venture of NASA, the United States Department of Energy, and government agencies in France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and Sweden.

  • richardmitnick 4:37 pm on April 18, 2016 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: , , , Gamma Rays,   

    From AAS NOVA: “Found: A Galaxy’s Missing Gamma Rays” 


    American Astronomical Society

    Recent observations have detected high-energy gamma-ray emission for the first time from the massive, star-forming galaxy Arp 220 (shown here in optical wavelengths, as imaged by Hubble). [NASA/ESA/C. Wilson (McMaster University)]

    NASA/ESA Hubble Telescope
    NASA/ESA Hubble Telescope

    Recent reanalysis of data from the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope has resulted in the first detection of high-energy gamma rays emitted from a nearby galaxy.

    NASA/Fermi Telescope
    NASA/Fermi Telescope

    This discovery reveals more about how supernovae interact with their environments.

    Colliding Supernova Remnant

    Supernova remnant Crab nebula. NASA/ESA Hubble
    Supernova remnant Crab nebula. NASA/ESA Hubble

    After a stellar explosion, the supernova’s ejecta expand, eventually encountering the ambient interstellar medium. According to models, this generates a strong shock, and a fraction of the kinetic energy of the ejecta is transferred into cosmic rays — high-energy radiation composed primarily of protons and atomic nuclei. Much is still unknown about this process, however. One open question is: what fraction of the supernova’s explosion power goes into accelerating these cosmic rays?

    In theory, one way to answer this is by looking for gamma rays.

    Gamma rays from the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, could be produced by proposed dark matter interactions
    Gamma rays from the Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, could be produced by proposed dark matter interactions

    In a starburst galaxy, the collision of the supernova-accelerated cosmic rays with the dense interstellar medium is predicted to produce high-energy gamma rays. That radiation should then escape the galaxy and be visible to us.

    Pass 8 to the Rescue

    Observational tests of this model, however, have been stumped by Arp 220. This nearby ultraluminous infrared galaxy is the product of a galaxy merger ~700 million years ago that fueled a frenzy of starbirth. Due to its dusty interior and extreme levels of star formation, Arp 220 has long been predicted to emit the gamma rays produced by supernova-accelerated cosmic rays. But though we’ve looked, gamma-ray emission has never been detected from this galaxy … until now.

    In a recent study*, a team of scientists led by Fang-Kun Peng (Nanjing University) reprocessed 7.5 years of Fermi observations using the new Pass 8 analysis software. The resulting increase in resolution revealed the first detection of GeV emission from Arp 220!

    Gamma-ray luminosity vs. total infrared luminosity for LAT-detected star-forming galaxies and Seyferts. Arp 220’s luminosities are consistent with the scaling relation. [Peng et al. 2016]

    Acceleration Efficiency

    Peng and collaborators argue that this emission is due solely to cosmic-ray interactions with interstellar gas. This picture is supported by the lack of variability in the emission, and the fact that Arp 220’s gamma-ray luminosity is consistent with the scaling relation between gamma-ray and infrared luminosity for star-forming galaxies. The authors also argue that, due to Arp 220’s high gas density, all cosmic rays will interact with the gas before escaping.

    Under these two assumptions, Peng and collaborators use the gamma-ray luminosity and the known supernova rate in Arp 220 to estimate how efficiently cosmic rays are accelerated by supernova remnants in the galaxy. They determine that 4.2 ± 2.6% of the supernova remnant’s kinetic energy is used to accelerate cosmic rays above 1 GeV.

    This is the first time such a rate has been measured directly from gamma-ray emission, but it’s consistent with estimates of 3-10% efficiency in the Milky Way. Future analysis of other ultraluminous infrared galaxies like Arp 220 with Fermi (and Pass 8!) will hopefully reveal more about these recent-merger, starburst environments.

    Fang-Kun Peng et al 2016* ApJ 821 L20. doi:10.3847/2041-8205/821/2/L20

    Science paper:

    See the full article here .

    Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

    STEM Icon

    Stem Education Coalition

Compose new post
Next post/Next comment
Previous post/Previous comment
Show/Hide comments
Go to top
Go to login
Show/Hide help
shift + esc
%d bloggers like this: