From “Sky & Telescope”: “Seeing Inside a Cosmic Superaccelerator”

From “Sky & Telescope”

May 19, 2022
Monica Young

Astronomers are exploring a celestial particle accelerator in the Eel Nebula that surrounds a distant pulsar.

This artist’s representation shows a pulsar wind nebula around another pulsar, named Geminga. Pulsar wind nebulae may be the cosmic sites of particle accelerators. Credit:
Nahks TrEhnl.

Take a coin out of your pocket and flip it. That coin-flip carries a peta-electron-volt (PeV) of energy. Now imagine a particle a million billion times smaller than your coin, far beyond the range of even the most powerful microscope — and it’s flitting by with that same amount of energy. That one particle surpasses by a thousandfold the energy that humanity’s most sophisticated particle accelerators can generate.

Yet the universe has no shortage of such exceedingly energetic particles. They slam into Earth’s atmosphere all the time. But while astronomers have long known these potent particles exist, they’ve struggled to understand how they come to be. Only recently has data begun to shed light on this phenomenon.

A Twisted Path

The trouble is, PeV particles are generally charged, whether they be protons or electrons. As such, they’re susceptible to the manipulations of magnetic fields, their paths bending this way and that as they pass through the galaxy. Tracing a single particle back to its source is nigh impossible.

But the processes that make energetic particles also makes gamma rays. And gamma rays, being chargeless photons, are not so easily led astray by the galaxy’s swirling magnetic field. These photons are thus the messengers that can tell astronomers where particles are being accelerated — and how.

Two facilities have come online in recent years to give astronomers access to the highest-energy gamma rays: the Large High Altitude Air Shower Observatory (LHAASO) in Tibet and the High-Altitude Water Cherenkov Observatory (HAWC) in Mexico. Their data has enabled astronomers to identify roughly a dozen possible cosmic particle accelerators, known as Pevatrons.

LHAASO, the cosmic ray observatory in Yangbajing, southwest China’s Tibet Autonomous Region. Credit: Institute of High Energy Physics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences

The Eel Nebula

One of these Pevatron candidates is the Eel Nebula, 11,400 light-years away in the constellation Scutum. In this nebula, a cloud of charged particles surrounds a pulsar as it speeds through space, leading to its distinct snakish shape.

Using observations not just of gamma rays but also X-rays and radio waves to describe the particle cloud, Daniel Burgess (Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory) and team put together a computer model that describes the current state of the pulsar, the plasma around it, and their evolution over time. In a study to appear in The Astrophysical Journal, they show that this particular Pevatron is accelerating electrons to PeV energies.

This animation shows first the X-ray photons detected from the Eel Nebula, then the gamma-ray emission. Gamma rays have higher energy and lower resolution than X-rays, so the image appears much blurrier at gamma rays. Credit: Daniel Burgess et al.

“This is one of the first unambiguously identified [electron-accelerating] PeVatron candidates,” says Henrike Fleischhack (Catholic University of America). “The follow-up observations and detailed modeling presented here . . . can serve as a blueprint for the study and identification of other PeVatron candidates.”

Indeed, team member Kaya Mori (also at Columbia Astrophysics Laboratory) confirms that the team is working on applying the same technique to multiple other pulsar clouds, including two nebulae evocatively named Dragonfly and Boomerang. Other teams are investigating alternative Pevatrons, such as the shocked plasma bubbles cast out by supernova explosions.

While the Eel Nebula is a clear candidate source of PeV electrons, Fleischhack points out that the energetic particles observed at Earth consist of not only electrons but protons. And so far, most of the other candidate Pevatrons have been found to only accelerate electrons.

“The question remains,” Fleischhack says: “Where are the [proton-accelerating] PeVatrons that we know must be out there?”

See the full article here .


Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

Stem Education Coalition

Sky & Telescope, founded in 1941 by Charles A. Federer Jr. and Helen Spence Federer, has the largest, most experienced staff of any astronomy magazine in the world. Its editors are virtually all amateur or professional astronomers, and every one has built a telescope, written a book, done original research, developed a new product, or otherwise distinguished him or herself.

Sky & Telescope magazine, now in its eighth decade, came about because of some happy accidents. Its earliest known ancestor was a four-page bulletin called The Amateur Astronomer, which was begun in 1929 by the Amateur Astronomers Association in New York City. Then, in 1935, the American Museum of Natural History opened its Hayden Planetarium and began to issue a monthly bulletin that became a full-size magazine called The Sky within a year. Under the editorship of Hans Christian Adamson, The Sky featured large illustrations and articles from astronomers all over the globe. It immediately absorbed The Amateur Astronomer.

Despite initial success, by 1939 the planetarium found itself unable to continue financial support of The Sky. Charles A. Federer, who would become the dominant force behind Sky & Telescope, was then working as a lecturer at the planetarium. He was asked to take over publishing The Sky. Federer agreed and started an independent publishing corporation in New York.

“Our first issue came out in January 1940,” he noted. “We dropped from 32 to 24 pages, used cheaper quality paper…but editorially we further defined the departments and tried to squeeze as much information as possible between the covers.” Federer was The Sky’s editor, and his wife, Helen, served as managing editor. In that January 1940 issue, they stated their goal: “We shall try to make the magazine meet the needs of amateur astronomy, so that amateur astronomers will come to regard it as essential to their pursuit, and professionals to consider it a worthwhile medium in which to bring their work before the public.”