From Sky & Telescope : “Gravitationally Unstable Disk May Collapse to Form Planets”

From Sky & Telescope

July 16, 2021
Lauren Sgro

Astronomers investigate the spiral arms of a young star’s disk and find evidence of a disk so massive that it could collapse to form planets.

The protoplanetary disk of Elias 2-27, shown with the dust continuum data in blue, along with different forms of carbon monoxide shown in yellow and red. The top panel shows the dust in blue along with gas probed at different velocities. Each image shows all the gas that travels at the specific velocity measured. The bottom panel is a composite of all dust and gas observed. Credit: ALMA (European Southern Observatory [Observatoire européen austral][Europäische Südsternwarte] (EU) (CL)/National Astronomy Observatory of Japan (JP)/B. Saxton National Radio Astronomy Observatory (US))/T. Paneque-Carreño (University of Chile [Universidad de Chile] (CL)).

Astronomers have found the first signposts of a gravitationally unstable disk around the young star Elias 2-27 — the first evidence to support this method of giant planet formation.

Protoplanetary disks of gas and dust leftover from stellar formation are known as the birthplace of planets. Astronomers understand that these disks give way to planets, but they’re still working to determine the exact evolution from dust to new worlds.

There’s more than one way to form a planet, and one path might be gravitational instability – when disks become so massive that they begin to fragment and cave in on themselves, directly collapsing into planets or forming spiral arms that trap material for future planet formation. An already-formed giant planet or interactions with a nearby star can also create spirals, but spiral structure born out of gravitational instability carries special characteristics.

A team led by Cassandra Hall (University of Georgia (US)) was the first to predict what the markers of gravitational instability might look like. Hall and collaborators used simulations to determine the telltale sign of gravitational instability in a disk, affectionately dubbed the “wiggle.” This wiggle disturbs the disk’s rotation on scales coinciding with the spirals, instead of in one specific location like the swirling kinks caused by planets.

In 2016, scientists at the Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA) first saw spiral arms in the disk of Elias 2-27.

Now, research led by Teresa Paneque-Carreño (now at Leiden University [Universiteit Leiden] (NL)), has spotted the hallmark wiggle. The finding makes these spiral arms the first convincing evidence for a gravitationally unstable disk. This study will appear in The Astrophysical Journal.

Evidence for Instability

With Hall’s predictions in mind, Paneque-Carreño’s collaboration used ALMA to observe the dust and gas in Elias 2-27’s disk. The results show that the expansive spiral arms are symmetric, with similar shapes and sizes, as predicted if gravitational instability were at work.

The key piece of evidence for instability, however, is the wiggle. The team used ALMA to observe the motions of carbon monoxide – which traces the harder-to-observe, but more abundant, hydrogen gas – and discovered the sought-after signature. As predicted, this disturbance coincides with the spiral arms in most observations. “It is really amazing to see this confirmation of velocity perturbations that so closely resembles what was predicted,” Hall says, who also worked on the Elias 2-27 studies.

Components of Elias 2-27’s disk, with images of the dust (blue) and carbon monoxide gas (C18O in yellow, 13CO in red) cycled through.
ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO)/T. Paneque-Carreño (Universidad de Chile), B. Saxton (NRAO).

These signals of gravitational instability also led to the first direct measurement of the mass in a planet-forming disk. Using the ALMA data, collaborator Benedetta Veronesi (University of Milan [Università degli Studi di Milano Statale] (IT)) reported the mass in a companion study that will appear in Astrophysical Journal Letters. Veronesi’s team concluded that Elias 2-27’s disk has 17% the mass of its star, creating conditions ripe for gravitational instabilities. In thinner disks, the star calls the shots with its powerful gravity governing the motions of the disk. But for a massive disk like the one around Elias 2-27, the disk’s own gravity starts to influence its dynamics, which enabled Veronesi’s team to determine its mass budget for future planet formation.

Oddities of Elias 2-27

While the spiral, wiggle, and mass all indicate the disk is experiencing gravitational instability, gaps in that same disk are throwing astronomers for a loop. For instance, there is a gap in the middle of the disk that is devoid of dust – a trait typically attributed to the commotion of a forming planet. However, a planet forming a gap of this size wouldn’t be large enough to form the spiral structure. Even if there were a planet at this location, it would get sucked into the star. On the other hand, gravitational instability cannot explain the gap, even though it explains the spirals.

While neither phenomenon can explain both features, the evidence for gravitational instability is still valid, says Ken Rice (University of Edinburgh (SCT)), who was not involved in the study. “I don’t think the presence of a gap necessarily suggests that spirals aren’t being driven by the gravitational instability.”

This illustration shows how the spiral arms caused by gravitational instability can help dust grains accumulate, which may move on to form planetary systems.
ALMA (ESO/NAOJ/NRAO)/T. Paneque-Carreño (Universidad de Chile), B. Saxton (NRAO).

Paneque-Carreño’s team also finds that the gas in Elias 2-27’s disk is unexpectedly asymmetric, such that the gas is thicker on one side of the disk than the other. The varying layers of gas indicate that material could still be falling onto the disk from the cloud that formed the Elias 2-27 system. This inbound gas might have ignited the gravitational instability and even caused a disk warp that morphed into the currently observed dust gap.

Although more observations are needed to solve the conundrums of Elias 2-27’s disk, the evidence for a massive, gravitationally unstable disk is quite compelling, says Rice.

Astronomers still need to work out how gravitational instability leads to planets — via direct collapse or indirectly, inciting spiral structures that help funnel material. Elias 2-27 and others like it will help astronomers piece together the planet formation puzzle.

See the full article here .


Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

Stem Education Coalition

Sky & Telescope, founded in 1941 by Charles A. Federer Jr. and Helen Spence Federer, has the largest, most experienced staff of any astronomy magazine in the world. Its editors are virtually all amateur or professional astronomers, and every one has built a telescope, written a book, done original research, developed a new product, or otherwise distinguished him or herself.

Sky & Telescope magazine, now in its eighth decade, came about because of some happy accidents. Its earliest known ancestor was a four-page bulletin called The Amateur Astronomer, which was begun in 1929 by the Amateur Astronomers Association in New York City. Then, in 1935, the American Museum of Natural History opened its Hayden Planetarium and began to issue a monthly bulletin that became a full-size magazine called The Sky within a year. Under the editorship of Hans Christian Adamson, The Sky featured large illustrations and articles from astronomers all over the globe. It immediately absorbed The Amateur Astronomer.

Despite initial success, by 1939 the planetarium found itself unable to continue financial support of The Sky. Charles A. Federer, who would become the dominant force behind Sky & Telescope, was then working as a lecturer at the planetarium. He was asked to take over publishing The Sky. Federer agreed and started an independent publishing corporation in New York.

“Our first issue came out in January 1940,” he noted. “We dropped from 32 to 24 pages, used cheaper quality paper…but editorially we further defined the departments and tried to squeeze as much information as possible between the covers.” Federer was The Sky’s editor, and his wife, Helen, served as managing editor. In that January 1940 issue, they stated their goal: “We shall try to make the magazine meet the needs of amateur astronomy, so that amateur astronomers will come to regard it as essential to their pursuit, and professionals to consider it a worthwhile medium in which to bring their work before the public.”