From astrobites: “Could Dark Matter be Black Holes?”

Astrobites bloc

Astrobites

Aug 31, 2017
Nora Shipp

Title: Did LIGO Detect Dark Matter?
Authors: Simeon Bird, Ilias Cholis, Julian B. Muñoz, Yacine Ali-Haïmoud, Marc Kamionkowski, Ely D. Kovetz, Alvise Raccanelli, Adam G. Riess
First Author’s Institution: Department of Physics and Astronomy, Johns Hopkins University

Status: Published in Physical Review Letters, Open Access

The mystery of the nature of dark matter is deepening. Dark matter particles have evaded our detection again and again, bringing into question the most popular theories (like WIMPS), and thereby opening the door to more exotic and unexpected dark matter models. In the midst of this growing uncertainty, a new possibility has arisen. LIGO has detected gravitational waves resulting from the merging of two black holes. This may seem irrelevant to dark matter, but black holes are really not unreasonable dark matter candidates. They don’t emit light, and they definitely do interact via gravity, and those are basically the only two things we know about dark matter.

The LIGO black holes have revived the idea of larger-than-particle dark matter, called MACHOs (Massive Astrophysical Compact Halo Objects). MACHOs are large, dark objects that are not made up of smaller fundamental dark matter particles, but actually act as the dark matter “particles” themselves. (Read more about them in this astrobite.) In the past, this kind of dark matter was a popular alternative to particle dark matter, but many years of work revealed that most sizes of these larger dark matter objects would disrupt the Universe in some way, leaving it different than the true Universe that we observe.

For example, black holes with masses around that of an individual star would have given themselves away in searches for the bending of starlight in their gravitational field (an effect called microlensing – read more about it in this astrobite).

Gravitational microlensing, S. Liebes, Physical Review B, 133 (1964): 835

More massive black holes would have left an imprint on the early Universe that would show up in the Cosmic Microwave Background.

CMB per ESA/Planck

ESA/Planck

These are only two examples of the many ways in which astrophysical observations tell us which masses are not possible for MACHOs (Figure 1). One mass that could be possible, is about 30 times the mass of the sun. It just so happens that LIGO has detected black holes of this mass!

2
Figure 1. The ruled out black hole MACHO masses from astrophysical observations. The x-axis is the mass of the black hole (in units of solar masses), and the y-axis is the fraction of dark matter that is made up of black holes. Each colored line surrounds a range of masses that has been ruled out (with more masses ruled out when black holes make up a larger fraction of dark matter). The black dashed line labeled PBH (Primordial Black Hole) is the allowed region in which the LIGO black holes fall. Source: Clesse et al, 2015.

The question then, is whether black hole dark matter is really consistent with the black hole mergers observed by LIGO. The first step – confirming that LIGO has detected black holes with the correct mass – is all set. The next step is not so simple. LIGO must detect black hole collisions that correspond to the known properties of dark matter.

We know that dark matter was an important part of the evolution of the early Universe, meaning that dark matter black holes must have existed at this time, and therefore cannot be typical stellar black holes that form in the death of massive stars. They must be a type of black hole that forms much earlier, referred to as “primordial black holes.”

So how do we tell whether LIGO is detecting stellar black holes or primordial black holes? The primary difference between them (apart from their origin) is their location. Stellar black holes should exist in regions with lots of stars, while primordial black holes should exist in regions with lots of dark matter. There is overlap between these regions, but they are not identical.

Primordial black holes, if they really are dark matter, have an additional constraint. They do not only need to exist in the known locations of dark matter, they must also exist in known quantities. We know quite a bit about the mass of dark matter halos around galaxies and galaxy clusters (Figure 2), so if we want primordial black holes to explain all of that dark matter, we have a pretty good idea of how many primordial black holes there must be.

Currently, it’s pretty difficult to tell exactly where a gravitational wave is coming from, so it’s not possible to say whether the black hole collisions happen in regions with lots of stars or lots of dark matter. The way to tell whether LIGO black holes could possibly be primordial black hole dark matter is to see whether the rate of LIGO observations matches up with the expected rate of primordial black hole collisions.

This is exactly the topic of today’s paper. The authors predict the rate of primordial black hole collisions and compare it to the LIGO observations. The predicted collision rate depends on the quantity of primordial black holes and their spatial distribution (regions of higher density have higher collision rates). Since this requires a precise knowledge of the spatial distribution of invisible matter, the prediction is quite approximate, but the authors do their best to use observations and simulations to make realistic assumptions about the shape and mass of dark matter halos. They find that the expected rate of primordial black hole mergers (Figure 3) is in fact consistent with the rate inferred from LIGO observations.

4
Figure 3. The rate of primordial black hole mergers per dark matter halo, as a function of halo mass (in units of solar masses). The two lines use different theories of dark matter halo structure. Source: Figure 2 in the paper.

Although this result is very approximate and certainly doesn’t rule out stellar black holes, it means that primordial black hole dark matter is a possibility!

As LIGO continues to detect more and more gravitational wave signals, we will be able to learn more about the rate of black hole collisions and the possibility of dark matter black holes.


Caltech/MIT Advanced aLigo Hanford, WA, USA installation


Caltech/MIT Advanced aLigo detector installation Livingston, LA, USA

Cornell SXS, the Simulating eXtreme Spacetimes (SXS) project


Gravitational waves. Credit: MPI for Gravitational Physics/W.Benger-Zib

ESA/eLISA the future of gravitational wave research

Additionally, as more gravitational wave detectors start collecting data, we will have more precise information on the location of each black hole merger. This will allow for a comparison between the spatial distribution of black holes and the relative spatial distributions of dark matter and stars. Even though all this sounds extremely complicated, and maybe a bit unlikely, it’s awesome that the seemingly unrelated detection of gravitational waves has opened the door to discussions of new theories of dark matter.

See the full article here .

Please help promote STEM in your local schools.

STEM Icon

Stem Education Coalition

What do we do?

Astrobites is a daily astrophysical literature journal written by graduate students in astronomy. Our goal is to present one interesting paper per day in a brief format that is accessible to undergraduate students in the physical sciences who are interested in active research.
Why read Astrobites?

Reading a technical paper from an unfamiliar subfield is intimidating. It may not be obvious how the techniques used by the researchers really work or what role the new research plays in answering the bigger questions motivating that field, not to mention the obscure jargon! For most people, it takes years for scientific papers to become meaningful.
Our goal is to solve this problem, one paper at a time. In 5 minutes a day reading Astrobites, you should not only learn about one interesting piece of current work, but also get a peek at the broader picture of research in a new area of astronomy.